Just kicking up a thread here, as I watch history working its way out here in the West and am feeling fairly glum about the way things are going. I also wonder if this is just some inevitable march from representative government to dictatorship/empire. I am thinking, in particular, about the transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire. To quote good ol' Wikipedia: "
the Roman Republic is generally considered one of the earliest examples of representative democracy." (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Republic). And yet, it was not a peaceful period:
"Unlike the Pax Romana of the Roman Empire, the Republic was in a state of quasi-perpetual war throughout its existence. Its first enemies were its Latin and Etruscan neighbours as well as the Gauls, who even sacked the city in 387 BC. The Republic nonetheless demonstrated extreme resilience and always managed to overcome its losses . . ."
However, "the center could not hold." It was not ultimately foreign enemies, but civil war based in class warfare that brought about the end of political equality and representative government:
"
At home, the Republic similarly experienced a long streak of social and political crises, which ended in several violent civil wars. At first, the Conflict of Orders opposed the patricians, the closed oligarchic elite, to the far more numerous plebs, who finally achieved political equality in several steps during the 4th century BC. Later, the vast conquests of the Republic disrupted its society, as the immense influx of slaves they brought enriched the aristocracy, but ruined the peasantry and urban workers."
The modern parallels are fairly obvious. I'll spare you the tales of destroyed reformers and civil wars that finally led up to the founding of the imperium. Needless to say, the aristos/elites won. This is not a given, as the French and Russian revolutions show. In either case, as Mark Twain is reputed to have said, “History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme.” I think we are in one of those times.
So, back to the question this thread began with: How vested should we be? We are just passing through. Should we just let it go or throw our heart and soul into trying to save what is under attack? Likewise, where would you or could you go?
The "West" has had a pretty good run, and representative government + human rights have once again reached a high point compared to prior eras, but can it continue? Is the cycle of history rotating once again back towards what seems to be its default position? If you haven't read about the social credit system put into place in China you should do so. You might also want to brush up on your George Orwell and
1984. The surveillance society is already here and can easily become even more pervasive as well as non-optional. Dictatorship can come in many forms, but it always seems to be ready to swallow us all. What will happen in this era will be far more technologically based, and the technology and power to do so currently exists.
Indeed, where could you go, not just in this lifetime, but in another? Another thread asks why people choose to incarnate in "bad" places. The question here is: Could we come to a time where there are no longer any "good" places to incarnate? Is it our duty to fight for the right, or . . . .?
Cordially,
S&S