The Earth is regularly viewed and photographed and filmed from the folks up on the ISS.
The Earth is a globe. Why is this even an argument? It can be proven by reason, logic and measurement alone. That's something that was concluded before space travel, and before it had been photographed.
So, Why do space agency scientists keep changing their minds as to its shape? Because they do, you know, as I already said.
I remember when I was a little girl and my father insisted I watch the 'Moon landing' with him, as he thought it would be educational and everyone at school would be talking about it. To be honest, it went over my head and I found it boring and would far rather have been outside playing with friends but it seemed their parents were also making them watch it because none were out. None playing hopscotch, cycling, skipping etc. So I settled on the sofa next to my father and noticed the changing expressions on his face more than I noticed the TV. At first he was leaning forward, transfixed in quiet anticipation and barely controlled excitement as he wondered if they would actually be able to land. Then his expression changed to puzzlement and it looked to me as if they were about to touch down. When they did, his face had changed to looking put out, cross and disbelieving. He said nothing except "They're meant to have landed". At the end of the broadcast he rose and went to turn off the telly (no remotes at that time), and then stood upright and said "I wonder if they really went there?". I asked why they would pretend, and he quite crossly and with disgust replied "Money!" then strode out the room. After that the only time he spoke of it was when he ocassionaly said "They are meant to have gone to the moon but they can't cure cancer?" or "solve poverty?", "stop wars", etc. Always, the words 'meant to have', never that they did.
Now, my father was in his latter 40's at that time, not a gullible younger man. He had been in the RAF and Operation Foxley, SOE during WWII and done government work for two or three years after the war, and still had contact with powerful people behind the scenes when I was young (I suspect he still sometimes even if rarely done government work, although I believe his words that he never killed anyone as he wanted to kill Hitler only - no one else). He and other family members had excellent bona fides. So he wasn't stupid. Far from it. He knew about heights, shadows, flying etc.
Just as oddly, not one of my playmates around our streets spoke of it nor any of my playmates at school except for one boy in the playground, but no one would talk about it with him (a very British thing to ignore a question or comment and change the subject rather than to disagree and maybe argue). More striking still was that the only time it came up in class was when a boy (same one as in the playground) raised his hand and asked the Teacher when we were going to cover it. The Teacher looked stunned for a moment, then looked around the class as she asked "Who believes we went to the Moon?". Three or four hands raised up, and mine went up and down a couple of times (unsure). The Teacher furrowed her usually uncreased brow and said "We will cover it sometime". We never did, and not in my later three schools either. My relatives never spoke of it, at least not in my hearing, and I never heard any of their visitors, friends or neighbours mention it either.
MSM here was less 'owned' then, and it seemed to be forgotten quite quickly - as if it never happened. A stark contrast to the time just preceeding the supposed landing when most people, particularly adults and boys, were buzzing and talking about it with great excitement.
I expect they all saw some things on the original broadcast that made it clear it wasn't real, and no doubt at least some of that footage has since been changed but still there are a lot of videos online that show it was fake, and how it was done.
Also, there are videos which show the true shapes of planets and stars. There are none that are solid that are globes, even though they appear to be so from a not powerful telescope. So why should Earth be a globe when no others are?
Myself, I do not believe we have been beyond the asteroid belt, and this is such a huge subject with so many proofs that is so that it would be too much to go into it here. People who are genuinley willing to challenge their paradigm can look it up anyway. As to anyone who isn't willing, then we wouldn't even be comparing the same level of knowledge so there is no point discussing further. Still, they could ask themselves why the NASA company would want to employ CGI expert Cameron. Also what the actual word Nasa means in Hebrew and ancient Egyptian.
Best wishes,
Angie