• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

What makes you feel someone's FPL is real?

Klaud, I have had my fair share of dead ends and rabbit holes. If I could show you the amount of paper I’ve printed out from websites and stuff about my WWII lifetime, you would be gobsmacked :confused: I haven’t needed ANY of it (excluding the copies of archive files from the Bundesarchiv) for over three years.

I’ve asked my guides to put books and information in my path that is relevant to me specifically, but that is because we made that way. That they would drop clues and I would have to work them out. I don’t know what arrangement you and your Guides made regarding the discovery of your own past lives, and I feel very strongly that we all have our different paths.

There really isn't an arrangement. With all due respect, I'm not sure I really believe in the concept of spirit guides.
 
There really isn't an arrangement. With all due respect, I'm not sure I really believe in the concept of spirit guides.

I think what happens between lives or whether we have "help" can vary from person to person as much as human lives can. Everyone's journey is different! Like, for me it was very important that in this life I'm "on my own" and find my path based on nothing else but my own intuition.
 
I probably thought of this INFJ drama because I'm an INFJ (which people will atutomatically question lol) and I too think it's silly to want to be one. I guess it is indeed the label people crave, being "special".

I've never heard of any kind of INFJ envy or misrepresentation. Is that a thing? If so, why is it a thing? I don't think INFJ would be desirable. Maybe in some circles.. but I think people would much prefer the outgoing, risk taking types. I've been divorced for a while and tried online dating and everyone for a while was posting their MB types and I never saw an INFJ, even though I am one. Maybe for bookish, nerdy types that are still stuck in a highschool mindset, INFJ may be appealing but from what I've seen in the adult world, it really doesn't seem to matter a lot and it's not desirable. I don't mean anything derogatory by remarks, I'm just seeing stereotypes in my head and I think the whole idea of people trying to define themselves by a label is a bit bonkers.

I admit I'm also inclined to think a person who was famous would understand it's not necessarily a good or more meaningful experience than a more unkown life. But maybe that could also be why someone, in some cases, who was previously famous would want to be famous again. If they were naive enough to think being famous would be glorious, and then they became famous and it wasn't, but in the next life they still didn't stop believing that it could be. Maybe they became even more adamant to make a good famous life for themselves in the next life. People's motivations are so different and all FPLs are so different as well. I'm sure people's experiences of fame vary greatly, not only because there are different kinds of fame, but also because our individual dispositions vary so greatly.

It depends on what you think famous is I suppose. I equate fame and famous with people that love being mired down in the attention. Famous, from fame, meaning fame seekers and maybe akin to notoriety. I think maybe another and equally acceptable term is well known life. I wouldn't call my past lives famous, but well known. My past lives weren't defined by the attention they had nor are my claims of them now.

Ergo, I think it's the idea of fame seeking that should raise some eyebrows. A person can have a famous past life, like an actor or musician and not be driven by fame to uncover that past life. It's also possible to be an actor or musician and not be driven by fame as well. I think that when people seek to connect to a past life and it's driven by fame, rather than deeper, more internal and intrinsic motivations, no one is wrong for questioning such motives, especially when they have little to offer in the ways of evidence. It's been said here that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and I agree.

I think that there are a few cases of people that reveled in attention and glory, but I think beyond a doubt that most "famous" people's lives are anything but enjoyable. I was a princess (or queen or however you want to look at it) in my past life and it freaking sucked. I'm sure people wanting to have their picture taken with me and being a guest at big events felt great, but on the whole, I was a prisoner, figuratively and realistically speaking. My "fame and wealth" was centered around my parents in all of my lives, including this one and I can tell you being privileged isn't what it's cracked up to be. It's rare when someone can obtain wealth and yet still maintain a stable, healthy and balanced family life. There are just as many broken families in the 1%, trust me, I know.

So yeah, famous or privileged lives aren't inherently any better that any else's. I think really, the question is, is what do each one of us make out of our lives? I'll argue that a celebrity making a few grandiose contributions to a charity accomplishes far less in their lives that people that make it their lives work to work with and contribute to others on a daily basis.

I think for a lot of people FPLs are about wish fulfillment. I hate that I do it too and I tend to roll my eyes at FPL claims when they're always the same people. over and over. A lot of the claims are based on completely innocent things like liking dresses and playing princess when you were a child or something.

Just here on the forum, we encourage people to be nice and accepting. The real cases will tend to stick around and offer more proof and substance, especially in the face of criticism, than the ones who aren't, real, I suppose.

I applaud your public attempt to keep yourself open minded, but I would also encourage you to not be so hard one yourself either :)
 
I've never heard of any kind of INFJ envy or misrepresentation. Is that a thing? If so, why is it a thing? I don't think INFJ would be desirable. Maybe in some circles.. but I think people would much prefer the outgoing, risk taking types. I've been divorced for a while and tried online dating and everyone for a while was posting their MB types and I never saw an INFJ, even though I am one. Maybe for bookish, nerdy types that are still stuck in a highschool mindset, INFJ may be appealing but from what I've seen in the adult world, it really doesn't seem to matter a lot and it's not desirable. I don't mean anything derogatory by remarks, I'm just seeing stereotypes in my head and I think the whole idea of people trying to define themselves by a label is a bit bonkers.

It's true that now that MBTI is more and more popular and a lot of people just take the test and post the result on their dating profile, the majority is not going to claim to be INFJs there. I've also been on one dating+networking site and INFJs are not that common.

In MBTI enthusiast circles there's still a trend though. I only have a theory of how that came to be. Carl Jung, the father of the cognitive function system has been widely agreed to be an INFJ, and I think maybe that's one of the reasons there might be a slight bias in favour of INFJs, in the history of the narrative that surrounds MBTI. (Like there is a negative bias toward INFPs though I have no clear theory for why that happened...) The other more obvious reason is that INFJs are, according to most sources, the rarest type, and there are a lot of people who are attracted to that sort of lable. Indeed, if they understood what INFJ as a type really means, they probably would not particularly desire to be INFJs. They don't actually want to be what INFJs really are, they just wish to be celebrated for whatever it is in themselves that they associate with being an INFJ. (And they are, or at least used to be, so much less likely to be celebrated if they identified with another type with a similar vibe, especially INFP.)

Also, the original internet typology community was probably mostly NT, NF, or introverted types, and while it may be true that at their core those types would actually desire to be more active and outgoing types, most of them were probably self-aware enough to know that they did not belong to that kind of personality type. They knew they were bookish, nerdy, introverted and "deep", so it made more sense for them to identify with a type that was celebrated for these qualities in the typology circles, than to go for the obvious lie that labeling themselves as ESTPs or something, would've been.

This is a simplified educated guess. :D I'm sure I could spend a whole day theorizing about this. But the reason I brough it up in the first place was because it's so similar to this trend where people want to have been well-known in their past life and don't really understand what it is about. They don't understand it isn't "cool", any more than an "unknown" life, likely even less. Being an INFJ is pretty much the same in this day and age. (I guess people never stop to think that INFJs must be rare for a reason... and it isn't because we're special. It's more likely because society at where it's going doesn't benefit from large numbers of INFJs like it benefits from large numbers of ISTJs for example.)

I could've come up with a more simple parallel if I had thought of it at the time: I have a friend who talks and talks about wanting to be a "good person" and to help people. However, he's so attached to the label of being good and doing good deeds that he never actually does any, because he thinks it's supposed to feel glorious somehow. He passes by almost every opportunity to help a friend or a stranger because those situations don't fit with what his ideal of "helping" is. He's so attached to the idea of being a helper of mankind that he doesn't realize that helping people consists largely of getting out of one's own comfort zone: it's work, work you do because you care about others and not your self-image. He turns down almost everyone who ask for his help, and yet he still manages to have this idea in his head that he is a helpful, selfless person.

I think similarly, a lot of people just don't realize what the life of that historical figure they so admire or identify with, must have been like, because things can look so much better and simpler on paper, or in vague fantasy, than they really are. People like to glorify hardships, but very few would actually do what their personal heroes did, or understand the real reasons behind those things.
 
It depends on what you think famous is I suppose.

I meant famous, well-known, popular, mythical, legendary etc. all synonymously at the start of this thread, since it wasn't really that relevant to my question (in my eyes) how well-known someone is, or in what way. But I can see it could matter a lot, since it wouldn't be the same to claim to be Jesus or King Arthur than it would be to claim to be someone who's only famous in your hometown.

I equate fame and famous with people that love being mired down in the attention. Famous, from fame, meaning fame seekers and maybe akin to notoriety. I think maybe another and equally acceptable term is well known life. I wouldn't call my past lives famous, but well known. My past lives weren't defined by the attention they had nor are my claims of them now.

I see! Personally it didn't cross my mind to think of it that way, since I think of fame as something that happens to a person, whether or not they want it is another matter.

Ergo, I think it's the idea of fame seeking that should raise some eyebrows. A person can have a famous past life, like an actor or musician and not be driven by fame to uncover that past life. It's also possible to be an actor or musician and not be driven by fame as well. I think that when people seek to connect to a past life and it's driven by fame, rather than deeper, more internal and intrinsic motivations, no one is wrong for questioning such motives, especially when they have little to offer in the ways of evidence. It's been said here that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and I agree.

Indeed, that's fair. :)

I think that there are a few cases of people that reveled in attention and glory, but I think beyond a doubt that most "famous" people's lives are anything but enjoyable. I was a princess (or queen or however you want to look at it) in my past life and it freaking sucked.

I'm afraid modern fairystories and Disney movies have unfortunately made a lot of people think being a princess is "so cool"... *sigh*

So yeah, famous or privileged lives aren't inherently any better that any else's. I think really, the question is, is what do each one of us make out of our lives?

Couldn't agree more.

I think for a lot of people FPLs are about wish fulfillment. I hate that I do it too and I tend to roll my eyes at FPL claims when they're always the same people. over and over. A lot of the claims are based on completely innocent things like liking dresses and playing princess when you were a child or something.

Yeah, it can be a comforting fantasy for many!

I applaud your public attempt to keep yourself open minded, but I would also encourage you to not be so hard one yourself either :)

Thanks! Why do you think I was being too hard on myself, though? I'm curious, because I didn't even realize that my message could come off that way.
 
I think what happens between lives or whether we have "help" can vary from person to person as much as human lives can. Everyone's journey is different! Like, for me it was very important that in this life I'm "on my own" and find my path based on nothing else but my own intuition.

That's what I was thinking too. Some of us are just meant to find the right paths on our own. For all my contact with spirits from God knows where, I've never seen anything remotely resembling a spirit guide.
 
From my experiences with those who label themselves as INFJs end up being disappointing especially where there is a lack of basic values or have repugnant ones like sexism towards men, racism towards whites and it goes on and on. All in all it makes me uncomfortable in my own skin and push people with this label away especially when they get on the hate train about certain political figures right now. Also it doesn't help that if one is an enneagram 4 they almost automatically figure you to be Anything else regardless of the tests so that is that. I really do have a deep seated loathing for group think and the harm it can cause when something takes hold over a large swath of people.

As for FPLs one lesson I learned here and elsewhere is that they end up being negative attention between people trying to fake it and others sinking their teeth in trying to figure every possible detail when someone comes up to be convincing.
 
There really isn't an arrangement. With all due respect, I'm not sure I really believe in the concept of spirit guides.

That’s fine. You’re perfectly entitled to have your beliefs. But only you know your ‘arrangement’. No one travels the physical alone.

Eva x
 
That’s fine. You’re perfectly entitled to have your beliefs. But only you know your ‘arrangement’. No one travels the physical alone.

Eva x

I wouldn't really call it being alone. There's definitely spirits hanging around, but they don't really give me advice or anything like that. Not even a nudge in the right direction.
 
I'm a Romanov claimant, but largely I generalize since it is easier then going through the details. Was I? Dunno. I know I have some very strange memories of Alexander Palace, Ipatiev House and some memories of ill children in a hospital (among others)...but I also concede that I could have been a servant, lesser nobility or any number of someones who was so enamored of the Romanov's in that life to the point I wanted to BE one and that crossed over into this memory of it.

That I died sometime in summer of the latter 19 teens from a painful attack and gunshot is not the question in my mind, I recall that moment of pain and fear clearly. Was it 1918? 1919? 1920? One date is true and one is not...it is entirely possible that I was a girl who treated the Romanov's as we do celebrities today and death was so common during Russia at that time as to be a question of validity. Houses of Special Purpose were not unheard of, the fate of the Romanov's was not entirely unique. My name was also not an uncommon one in Russia then or now, and the one I feel most drawn toward was known for being down to earth...a trait a commoner could well have emulated then successfully, or even someone so jaded that they wished they were like that. The possibility of it does not escape me.

I know SOMETHING happened to me and my memories of that time period. I also am well aware that the likelihood is not in my favor, and that type death is not uncommon during that time period. I also know PL memories are odd, and such whoever it was grasps onto the Romanov's very heavily may do so because Russia is home to her, someone they admired in life and the closest thing they can pull from this life to let me know I was a part of that timeline.

It is also a fairly new revelation (as in I knew I was Russian and died during WWI since I was a child and was captive with wooden fences) but nothing else until about 18 months ago when something hit me very hard about the Romanovs. The fact some of the memories cleared and then I felt settled and got the feeling of "no more to see here, move along" is also questionable in one way, and another more of a sign of I found my answer.
I am not sure If i am correct, and dont fully trust me. But have you ever feel conected to Olga or Maria? Im anistasia NAd you...just speak like them.
 
Whenever I have met someone outside this forum, elsewhere online or irl, who had past life memories, it was always of a famous one. As has often been discussed on this forum, it's not believable that everyone had a famous past life, or that the famous one is the one everyone remembers. Especially since there are many people out there who claim the same FPL.

Actually, there is a 'simple' explanation, even if to the most it is likely to seem unbelievable.

Look at physical reality like at a video-game. To play it, you choose one of the many setups available (historical time, geographical location, variant of 'reality'), and an avatar (gender, race, easy / hard life, something you want to learn / practice / enjoy). Then you play it. Sometimes it doesn't turn out as you expected. Once your game is over you play again, choosing other setups and avatars, or even the same combination to play it differently.

The same avatar will be played over and over by different players, sometimes repeatedly by the same player several times.

It is normal that the players should remember better the plays that were more memorable, that produced stronger emotions, and surely a more famous life will be more memorable than an ordinary one, and recalled by more players.
 
I remember a life where I was married to a man who rarely spoke. We lived in a forest, I raised his children (none of my own), we got along, I was too old to consider traditional marriage of the time and he needed a mother for his children and we married to suit both ends. We survived on little, but had enough. How do you explain a life that was quietly content? We were happy in a time of hardship, he worked hard to provide, I worked hard to make a home...very few people are interested in lives of quiet desperation. They aren't what people want to talk about with past lives.

No great romance, not much ever happened...we lived. Time and history forgot about us, and those like us as my life in this time will be forgotten to time because I am not memorable in my own quiet life.
 
I see that I have not properly replied to this thread, only the part concerning to MBTI. There are several factors that I take into consideration when believing or not believing someone's FPL claim. In my opinion they are:

Lack of skepticism towards their own claim: if someone is 100% sure they were someone, I don't believe them. I'm not 100% sure that I exist in this life, that the sky is blue, that there is a soul, much less of a past life identity. Also, claiming to be 100% of one's FPL denotes being closed off to questioning. How can you even question something that you are 100% sure about? You can feel all you want that you are this person, but that doesn't mean you should not scrutinize your feelings with your reason.

Need for attention: If you come across as needing attention, I don't believe your FPL claim. If I'm new to a forum and all I talk about is how I was George Washington, I change my userpic to a dollar bill, I talk about the good old days of the American Revolution, how I already found the reincarnation of Alexander Hamilton in my neighbor, and how much I looked like George Washington in my baby pictures, most likely not only I was not him but I'm also not serious about reincarnation and only care about it from a pop culture perspective. These people tend to disappear rather quickly when they don't receive the attention that they seek.

Long list of similarities but lack of validated memories: I have brown hair, I always liked the Beatles, I have a good ear for music and I find generally easy to play instruments, I like England and Scotland, my mom's name was Mary, I think often about the death of John Lennon, so that means for sure I am Paul McCartney, right? Similarities are just that, similarities, and if I look hard enough I can find them with any person (dead or alive) but that doesn't mean I was them in a past life.

Fantastic claims: if someone claims to be Lenin and also mentions things like having Stalin's ghost trapped in a bottle after a voodoo session or managing to obtain a piece of his soul when they visited the Kremlin, I won't believe them.

Trying too hard: if someone comes across as acting like a stereotypical version of their supposed FPL self, claims to be Napoleon and starts all their posts with "Bonjour mes amis!" and then proceeds to act all tough because they "commanded armies", I won't believe them (and I would probably laugh). Reincarnation is not roleplay. Probably Napoleon was a normal dude.

Summarizing, I would be inclined to believe someone's FPL if they come across as a normal balanced person who has doubts and is able to scrutinize and take criticism of their own case. Someone who also is interested in other aspects of reincarnation than themselves and in other non-famous past lives that they may have had.

I would also like to emphasize that because someone's life wasn't famous, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be scrutinized. If I say that I was a shepherd in Scotland in 1635 and I died falling off a cliff, probably everyone will be supportive and nobody will tell me anything about my claim because I will be seen as having nothing to gain by lying. However, I could be full of baloney and unconsciously embellishing that supposed past life.
 
I see that I have not properly replied to this thread, only the part concerning to MBTI. There are several factors that I take into consideration when believing or not believing someone's FPL claim. In my opinion they are:

Lack of skepticism towards their own claim: if someone is 100% sure they were someone, I don't believe them. I'm not 100% sure that I exist in this life, that the sky is blue, that there is a soul, much less of a past life identity. Also, claiming to be 100% of one's FPL denotes being closed off to questioning. How can you even question something that you are 100% sure about? You can feel all you want that you are this person, but that doesn't mean you should not scrutinize your feelings with your reason.

Need for attention: If you come across as needing attention, I don't believe your FPL claim. If I'm new to a forum and all I talk about is how I was George Washington, I change my userpic to a dollar bill, I talk about the good old days of the American Revolution, how I already found the reincarnation of Alexander Hamilton in my neighbor, and how much I looked like George Washington in my baby pictures, most likely not only I was not him but I'm also not serious about reincarnation and only care about it from a pop culture perspective. These people tend to disappear rather quickly when they don't receive the attention that they seek.

Long list of similarities but lack of validated memories: I have brown hair, I always liked the Beatles, I have a good ear for music and I find generally easy to play instruments, I like England and Scotland, my mom's name was Mary, I think often about the death of John Lennon, so that means for sure I am Paul McCartney, right? Similarities are just that, similarities, and if I look hard enough I can find them with any person (dead or alive) but that doesn't mean I was them in a past life.

Fantastic claims: if someone claims to be Lenin and also mentions things like having Stalin's ghost trapped in a bottle after a voodoo session or managing to obtain a piece of his soul when they visited the Kremlin, I won't believe them.

Trying too hard: if someone comes across as acting like a stereotypical version of their supposed FPL self, claims to be Napoleon and starts all their posts with "Bonjour mes amis!" and then proceeds to act all tough because they "commanded armies", I won't believe them (and I would probably laugh). Reincarnation is not roleplay. Probably Napoleon was a normal dude.

Summarizing, I would be inclined to believe someone's FPL if they come across as a normal balanced person who has doubts and is able to scrutinize and take criticism of their own case. Someone who also is interested in other aspects of reincarnation than themselves and in other non-famous past lives that they may have had.

I would also like to emphasize that because someone's life wasn't famous, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be scrutinized. If I say that I was a shepherd in Scotland in 1635 and I died falling off a cliff, probably everyone will be supportive and nobody will tell me anything about my claim because I will be seen as having nothing to gain by lying. However, I could be full of baloney and unconsciously embellishing that supposed past life.
The mental images you just provided us are much funnier than they should have been. (Especially the George Washington one.)
 
I see that I have not properly replied to this thread, only the part concerning to MBTI. There are several factors that I take into consideration when believing or not believing someone's FPL claim. In my opinion they are:

Lack of skepticism towards their own claim: if someone is 100% sure they were someone, I don't believe them. I'm not 100% sure that I exist in this life, that the sky is blue, that there is a soul, much less of a past life identity. Also, claiming to be 100% of one's FPL denotes being closed off to questioning. How can you even question something that you are 100% sure about? You can feel all you want that you are this person, but that doesn't mean you should not scrutinize your feelings with your reason.

Need for attention: If you come across as needing attention, I don't believe your FPL claim. If I'm new to a forum and all I talk about is how I was George Washington, I change my userpic to a dollar bill, I talk about the good old days of the American Revolution, how I already found the reincarnation of Alexander Hamilton in my neighbor, and how much I looked like George Washington in my baby pictures, most likely not only I was not him but I'm also not serious about reincarnation and only care about it from a pop culture perspective. These people tend to disappear rather quickly when they don't receive the attention that they seek.

Long list of similarities but lack of validated memories: I have brown hair, I always liked the Beatles, I have a good ear for music and I find generally easy to play instruments, I like England and Scotland, my mom's name was Mary, I think often about the death of John Lennon, so that means for sure I am Paul McCartney, right? Similarities are just that, similarities, and if I look hard enough I can find them with any person (dead or alive) but that doesn't mean I was them in a past life.

Fantastic claims: if someone claims to be Lenin and also mentions things like having Stalin's ghost trapped in a bottle after a voodoo session or managing to obtain a piece of his soul when they visited the Kremlin, I won't believe them.

Trying too hard: if someone comes across as acting like a stereotypical version of their supposed FPL self, claims to be Napoleon and starts all their posts with "Bonjour mes amis!" and then proceeds to act all tough because they "commanded armies", I won't believe them (and I would probably laugh). Reincarnation is not roleplay. Probably Napoleon was a normal dude.

Summarizing, I would be inclined to believe someone's FPL if they come across as a normal balanced person who has doubts and is able to scrutinize and take criticism of their own case. Someone who also is interested in other aspects of reincarnation than themselves and in other non-famous past lives that they may have had.

I would also like to emphasize that because someone's life wasn't famous, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be scrutinized. If I say that I was a shepherd in Scotland in 1635 and I died falling off a cliff, probably everyone will be supportive and nobody will tell me anything about my claim because I will be seen as having nothing to gain by lying. However, I could be full of baloney and unconsciously embellishing that supposed past life.
Did you used Napoleon as a example because of the new Napoleon (2023.) movie that just came out this month or did you just used him a example regardless of whether or not a movie about him was coming out this month? Just wondering. Sorry if I got off the topic of this thread for a split second but, I was just curious.
 
The mental images you just provided us are much funnier than they should have been. (Especially the George Washington one.)

Thank you. My pleasure.

Did you used Napoleon as a example because of the new Napoleon (2023.) movie that just came out this month or did you just used him a example regardless of whether or not a movie about him was coming out this month? Just wondering. Sorry if I got off the topic of this thread for a split second but, I was just curious.

I used Napoleon because I wanted a known historical character that nobody has yet claimed (or at least not recently) to not seem as I was personally attacking anyone. However, the movie did cross my mind as my family and I would like to see it.
 
I used Napoleon because I wanted a known historical character that nobody has yet claimed (or at least not recently) to not seem as I was personally attacking anyone. However, the movie did cross my mind as my family and I would like to see it.
Well I haven't seen any supposed famous past lives on this forum lately (but to be fair, I don't visit it too often).
 
I wonder if we will see more people claiming to have been Napoleon or someone famous associated with him after this movie, like it was the case after the Hamilton musical.
Oh God not the Hamilton musical! I like the music but I have many mixed feelings about the musical itself, and the fandom scares me.

By the way I do know that there were some people on this forum a while back who claimed to be reincarnation of Alexander Hamilton and the likes (nothing to do with the musical though). I even talked to somebody who claimed to be Thomas Jefferson. Well I can't say if these people were legitimate or not, but something I will admit is that the Thomas Jefferson person's writing style was extremely similar to Thomas Jefferson's.
 
Something else that I take as a factor when deciding to believe someone is CONSISTENCY. Not only with FPLs but with any past life. If you belive that you were a conquistador but then all of a sudden (without any MAJOR breakthrough) you think that you were instead an aboriginal of the Americas instead of such conquistador, and then you say you misinterpreted everything and you were something else instead, how can I trust anything you say if you cannot scrutiny your feelings and memories enough? If you are unsure, then it's best to not say anything or say that you are unsure.

(BTW, the Napoleon movie was a borefest, I feel bad for the real reincarnation of Napoleon if they are left to be triggered by THAT)
 
If you belive that you were a conquistador but then all of a sudden (without any MAJOR breakthrough) you think that you were instead an aboriginal of the Americas instead of such conquistador, and then you say you misinterpreted everything and you were something else instead, how can I trust anything you say if you cannot scrutiny your feelings and memories enough?
But what if they were both, albeit in two separate lifetimes? Because you know, people can have multiple past lives.
 
Something else that I take as a factor when deciding to believe someone is CONSISTENCY. Not only with FPLs but with any past life. If you belive that you were a conquistador but then all of a sudden (without any MAJOR breakthrough) you think that you were instead an aboriginal of the Americas instead of such conquistador, and then you say you misinterpreted everything and you were something else instead, how can I trust anything you say if you cannot scrutiny your feelings and memories enough? If you are unsure, then it's best to not say anything or say that you are unsure.

(BTW, the Napoleon movie was a borefest, I feel bad for the real reincarnation of Napoleon if they are left to be triggered by THAT)
There is a good chance that whoever is that soul likely doesn't remember just like most these days though that might change in the coming years/decades. All in all this really is the Truman Show/West World so everything is possible.
 
But what if they were both, albeit in two separate lifetimes? Because you know, people can have multiple past lives.
This is to be expected and multiple sources have stated that on average it is usually a few concurrent lives sometimes more at any given time without things getting too complicated.
 
Back
Top