SeaAndSky
Senior Registered
Hi TM,
I did a little research on "The Gospel of the Beloved Companion". It appears to be a revised version of the NIV translation of the Gospel of John. You can read the adverse reactions by going to the one star reviews on Amazon (which are mostly based on well-founded doubts about its authenticity rather than disputes about what it says). They are worthwhile, and are not the usual snark-fest. (I think some really wish it was authentic). OTOH, there is actually a book out analyzing the Gospel of the Beloved Companion that gives a fairly positive evaluation here:
amazon.com/deeper-look-Gospel-Beloved-Companion-ebook/dp/B00IVWEHOO#customerReviews
However, I have no idea what the scholarly credentials of the evaluating author are. Plus, I'm a bit suspicious of this Gospel because the purported translator of the Gospel of the Beloved Companion cannot be traced (at least by me or the author of the evaluation). The evaluator points out many of the authentication issues in her book, so it is not (at the least) a complete positive spin job. Consequently, this could be a revolutionary addition to the Christian cannon, or a complete fake. I'd prefer the former, but fear the latter is actually the case.
Then, there is Arthur Guirdham. He was actually a very brilliant man, and I am surprised I haven't obtained and combed through all of his books at this point. There is a very positive review of his work overall (including his famous Cathar books) here: https://ellisctaylor.com/2016/01/09/new-years-eve-without-arthur-guirdham/
One of the things that all of this points out to me is that normal scholarly resources cannot take me to the next step. The Crusade and Inquisition were too thorough in their work of destroying people and records. This leaves, for the time being, only the chance that some forgotten and hidden group has preserved some relevant literature/information (as is claimed in regard to the Gospel of the Beloved Companion), or the recovery of such information via past life memory and research (as is claimed by Guirdham). These will probably be my next areas of research.
Cordially,
S&S
I did a little research on "The Gospel of the Beloved Companion". It appears to be a revised version of the NIV translation of the Gospel of John. You can read the adverse reactions by going to the one star reviews on Amazon (which are mostly based on well-founded doubts about its authenticity rather than disputes about what it says). They are worthwhile, and are not the usual snark-fest. (I think some really wish it was authentic). OTOH, there is actually a book out analyzing the Gospel of the Beloved Companion that gives a fairly positive evaluation here:
amazon.com/deeper-look-Gospel-Beloved-Companion-ebook/dp/B00IVWEHOO#customerReviews
However, I have no idea what the scholarly credentials of the evaluating author are. Plus, I'm a bit suspicious of this Gospel because the purported translator of the Gospel of the Beloved Companion cannot be traced (at least by me or the author of the evaluation). The evaluator points out many of the authentication issues in her book, so it is not (at the least) a complete positive spin job. Consequently, this could be a revolutionary addition to the Christian cannon, or a complete fake. I'd prefer the former, but fear the latter is actually the case.
Then, there is Arthur Guirdham. He was actually a very brilliant man, and I am surprised I haven't obtained and combed through all of his books at this point. There is a very positive review of his work overall (including his famous Cathar books) here: https://ellisctaylor.com/2016/01/09/new-years-eve-without-arthur-guirdham/
One of the things that all of this points out to me is that normal scholarly resources cannot take me to the next step. The Crusade and Inquisition were too thorough in their work of destroying people and records. This leaves, for the time being, only the chance that some forgotten and hidden group has preserved some relevant literature/information (as is claimed in regard to the Gospel of the Beloved Companion), or the recovery of such information via past life memory and research (as is claimed by Guirdham). These will probably be my next areas of research.
Cordially,
S&S