• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

My Past Life as Mary Queen of Scots

The other one was a chap who was in some distress when he found the forum because he had thought he was Adolf Hitler.


When people asked him a few questions about exactly what he remembered, it turned out that although he had a childhood fascination with WWII, especially the Nazis, he had memories of being in front of a huge crowd all yelling 'Seig heil' and all kinds of things like this, he had got hold of the wrong end of the stick somewhat.


Again, as in the above story, with a bit more digging it turned out that he was in the Fuhrer's entourage, rather than being the man himself. Needless to say this was a huge relief to him, but still all very interesting and therapeutic in the long run. He had been quite disturbed about this idea, as you can imagine, and found nobody to really talk to about it before who really knew about this kind of thing and could advise him.
 
We-R-One,


Thank you for coming back to the forum and posting your replies. I have learned much from them, especially your links which I certainly will follow, without checking them out I guess they are linked to what I call the Law of Attraction which I thought was not real for a long time until I researched a bit and started using it. I was shocked when it worked.


The book that I just finished writing is in part about energy and how it works when used in a very interesting way. I'll bet it is connected to the "field". I never knew the "why" it was, just the "how". I have a feeling I was supposed to read your post. Thanks for the links. :)


I hope you continue to post about your MQOS lifetime, especially how you were taught to discover it by experts. I would love to learn more how that works.
 
Tanguerra,


I think the issue wasn't in the questions that were asked but in the manner they were asked. One should never feel attacked when reading a response to a post, especially on this website.


Perhaps someone can bring the rules of posting back up and we all could remind ourselves of them, especially etiquette for posting. I only want everyone to have the same feeling I did when I first signed up so very long ago. I felt like I was among friends and people were willing to help me discover the answers I needed.


No one attacked me for the questions I posted no matter how crazy they might have seemed. Everyone reached out to help me. I hope the members here continue to help each other so that even if a person believes they were someone that they weren't their journey of discovery is one of learning and not bullying.
 
we-R-one said:
I didn’t come up with the name of who I was, it was given to me. From that point forward through the methodology I was shown by Dr. Semkiw, I began to find matches in this life that were tying me to Marie as I scoured history looking for clues. This is what you’re supposed to do!
Click to expand...
What a painstaking method! It seems vital to have been someone research-able for this technique to work. Sadly, I don't think I could apply it in my case.


I think a regression would be an incredible supplement to all you have done to research this already, though. The conscious memories are amazing to me, and I assume you would find them interesting as well.
 
Welcome back...


we-R-one! I found your story VERY interesting...and because I believe that it is impossible to "prove" anything here...I assume all things are possible...and...Mary Queen of Scots is one of my favorite stories in history...I, for one, am pleased to "meet" you!!
 
Mama2HRB said:
Maybe the question should be What proof do you have that she was NOT Mary Queen of Scots?
Click to expand...
Good point!


Can I just say that in order to maintain credibility in this forum, we try to cater for everyone, believers and skeptics alike. If we started picking and choosing which posts are allowed to stay, and which posts should go, then the forum gives the impression of being closed minded, and then we do not get taken seriously by anyone at all. Of course, this is a past life forum, so obviously we will always be biased towards 'pro' reincarnation, but we can't and we don't shy away from debate, and any member who joins with an experience to share, has to be prepared for the fact that a certain percentage of readers are simply not going to find it easy to believe them, this is especially true for members who believe they were somebody famous in a past life. However, we also try to encourage and promote a high level of respect and politeness between everyone who participates here. It is not for us, neither individually or collectively, to judge another persons experiences. By all means, go ahead and debate, ask questions, offer your advice and opinions etc; but when a member feels that they are being attacked or intimidated by another person, and others can see that as well, then clearly something is wrong.


All we are asking is this: read your replies before posting, how would it make you feel if you were the one on the receiving end of your reply after posting your experiences? I'm not talking about the content, but the tone. Just a few additional words of politeness or diplomacy can make an enormous difference: "Thank you for sharing your experience, can I offer my opinion......." or, "I respect your views, however......" are just a few examples. A bit of courtesy costs nothing, it takes nothing away from your point, and it can make a huge difference to an individuals' experience of the forum.


Thanks for coming back We-R-One, and i'm sorry that your first impression of the forum was a bad one. I sincerely hope that you will stay and participate, because there are some really wonderful people here who want to hear your story - they're not all going to sit back and accept everything you say as given, but I know that wasn't the reason why you were upset.
 
we-R-one said:
I didn’t make the ’assumption’ and I was using the methodology shown to me by Semkiw who’s a PROFESSIONAL in the field,….
Click to expand...
Welcome back. But, I think you need to go back and read the CONTENT of my posts carefully. I never said you made an ‘assumption’. You have taken my response to tanguerra and misconstrued it as something I said to you and about you, which was not the case at all. (My point of reference was all the cases I have looked at in which assumptions were made by those - i.e. "some" - people). Please don’t misconstrue my words.


I did however question the leap from your thinking/believing/knowing (whatever) that you had a past life in the renaissance era to being MQOS. This is what I actually said, although I could have expressed myself more clearly:

firebird said:
In this instance we-R-one, I have to agree with Tanguerra about the leap from thinking/believing you had a past life in the renaissance era to being MQOS.
“It was during this reading I finally got the name of the person and life I had been remembering. I was given the name Marie R. Stuart, aka Mary Queen of Scots, cousin to Elizabeth I.” It’s very possible you were given this name to help you make the connection to the person you were, not that you necessarily were MQOS. Someone that tells me I was X doesn’t make it so, unless there are many factors (solid evidence) that prove this to be so.
Click to expand...
As you are the individual making the claim to such a prominent life, then you must realise that it is you (not others) that needs to provide sufficient evidence that supports your claim. IMO, if your case evidence is strong, your “PERCEIVED” lack of expertise in those commenting here is irrelevant ... just as it is irrelevant to me who you consulted, whether a Dr. or Joe Bloggs.


If you cannot provide some information that is pertinent/important to your case, due to the privacy concerns of others, then I am curious why have you chosen to share your story knowing there will be gaps in your case evidence? I know this is an issue for some people who believe they were someone notable, and it is why they prefer not to share their story publicly.


I was not aware that Dr. Semkiw did not post royalty cases on his website. That’s interesting, given that I did see a royalty case on his website a few years ago – that of a conductor who he claimed was French royalty, but the name at this minute escapes me. If I recall, I will post it here. I do know of other cases (not related to royalty) that Dr. Semkiw and Kevin Ryerson have looked at which have also not been posted on the website (and I know that privacy wasn’t an issue), so I find it a little curious.


If the questioning and commenting from posters like me doesn’t dissuade you from continuing, then I look forward to hearing more of your story, and importantly seeing the evidence that illustrates you were MQOS; and I hope that in doing so you also address some of the questions that members put to you here without feeling unnecessarily threatened/attacked by the directness of people like me.

Mama2HRB said:
Maybe the question should be What proof do you have that she was NOT Mary Queen of Scots?
Click to expand...
1. cover face


2. Part of the answer lies in the fact that discussion about other people's lives is against the forum rules here. So, the onus of proof must fall with the individual making the claim.
 
Mama2HRB said:
Maybe the question should be What proof do you have that she was NOT Mary Queen of Scots?
Click to expand...
Mama2HRB, the forum doesn't allow discussion of other people's lives, so the burden of proof must be with the individual making the claim.
 
hi we-R-one, I too am glad that you came back. I would like though to ask you to give the forum another chance. While many of our members here do not have PHDs or run websites or author books about reincarnation, they do work extremely hard at looking up facts for validating other's memories, lending their particular expertise and generally being very kind and liberal with moral support.


It can be tough having a famous past life (I have two, so trust me, I know!) and this forum helped me greatly after I was rebuffed by IISIS with little more than a virtual shrug.


So I'm not 100% sure what happened and I'm really sorry that we got started off on the wrong foot. But what went on here in this thread is not typical of what goes on, on a daily basis.


Maybe if we can understand what your goal here is, it can help us to understand you. Were you looking for friendship? Did you need help finding some facts? etc.


We're definitely willing to give this another try and we're glad you came back!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top