alienstyle
New Member
I've translated the REPORT into English:-
http://alienstylewriter.weebly.com/report-translation.html
http://alienstylewriter.weebly.com/report-translation.html
Bengali Newspaper Report : A Case in Tripura, INDIA (2005)
- Thread starter alienstyle
- Start date
alienstyle
New Member
Just see the attitude of these Psychologists/Psychiatrists in even INDIA! - I wondered whether they even respected the Indian Philosophy & Religions.
They were totally defying both the Past Life Hypnosis and the Spontaneous Cases.
But in contrast, look at the many general people here. It is mostly them who are rather preserving the belief in the reincarnation in India.
They were totally defying both the Past Life Hypnosis and the Spontaneous Cases.
But in contrast, look at the many general people here. It is mostly them who are rather preserving the belief in the reincarnation in India.
alienstyle
New Member
Jatiswar
I have introduced here a NEW word: Jatiswar. (It's a Bengali word standing for the otherwise long expression in English which is: A Person Who Remembers Previous Life/Lives.)
Like Karma, this is another popular Indian word that I now propose to popularize in the rest of the world...
I have introduced here a NEW word: Jatiswar. (It's a Bengali word standing for the otherwise long expression in English which is: A Person Who Remembers Previous Life/Lives.)
Like Karma, this is another popular Indian word that I now propose to popularize in the rest of the world...
Last edited by a moderator:
alienstyle
New Member
My Preliminary Review
A weakness of the Case is that the seeming 'Jatiswar' couldn't tell the NAME & the EXACT ADDRESS of the Previous Personality.
The village has been identified, even the position of the Jeep to park there has also been located; but the Jatiswar's former home couldn't be pinpointed. So the previous family couldn't be tracked too.
But a strength of the Case lies in the DRAMA (ups & downs) of the unfolding of the events as reported by the Informants. It indicates that the accident itself was not much of a discussed event in that area. So the typical 'hearing hypothesis' by the child from the Neighbors - as 'conceptualized' by the typical Psychology doctors - has a feeble probability to fight out the 'empiric' evidences manifesting.
Another strength has ushered in even the final anti-climax, when there arose the Jeep owner in the scene. And as the report describes, he didn't want to speak at all anything about the vehicle. - Why did he maintain PRIVACY? - Was he actually the first person to realize that, what the child was saying is true.
A weakness of the Case is that the seeming 'Jatiswar' couldn't tell the NAME & the EXACT ADDRESS of the Previous Personality.
The village has been identified, even the position of the Jeep to park there has also been located; but the Jatiswar's former home couldn't be pinpointed. So the previous family couldn't be tracked too.
But a strength of the Case lies in the DRAMA (ups & downs) of the unfolding of the events as reported by the Informants. It indicates that the accident itself was not much of a discussed event in that area. So the typical 'hearing hypothesis' by the child from the Neighbors - as 'conceptualized' by the typical Psychology doctors - has a feeble probability to fight out the 'empiric' evidences manifesting.
Another strength has ushered in even the final anti-climax, when there arose the Jeep owner in the scene. And as the report describes, he didn't want to speak at all anything about the vehicle. - Why did he maintain PRIVACY? - Was he actually the first person to realize that, what the child was saying is true.
Last edited by a moderator:
So sad to realize that there seems to be a leaning toward the 'hearing hypothesis,' yet I believe in many cases the opportunity for being fed information did not exist.
In the story you linked here was it clear that someone did die in the jeep accident? I may have misunderstood but thought they did not determine that. If so that may be why the person did not want to talk about the accident.
In the story you linked here was it clear that someone did die in the jeep accident? I may have misunderstood but thought they did not determine that. If so that may be why the person did not want to talk about the accident.
alienstyle
New Member
Hi Leesea,Leesea said:
An old woman in the village (where the Jeep's parking space was found) however did announce: "...One died , and where the other had gone to isn’t known to me." - & this is exactly the village where the Jatiswar claimed to have lived before!
On the other hand, the Jeep owner's sister was saying: "...Whether any of the two died in the accident isn’t known to anyone ."
Of course, these two Informants evidently don't match in their statements. And thus arose your idea: they did not determine that.
But who is MORE LIKELY to tell the truth?...
The old woman resident in the Jeep's parking village? Or the sister of the Jeep-owner residing in another village? (Where the owner himself maintains a rigid privacy policy, the last sentence of his sister may be influenced by it, thus pointing out to an agnostic ending!)
Last edited by a moderator: