• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

Civilization Ending Natural Catastrophes

SeaAndSky

Senior Registered
This thread is related to the ancient civilizations thread. The question that comes up with regard to civilizations of the past that disappeared is: what happened? Well, obviously, we can often take some clues from history showing droughts, climate change, conquest, etc. But when things get far enough back, these become very "iffy". We also have the issue of our own civilization's demise to think about. What did them in might also do us in.

However, the emphasis here is on "natural"--not HOMOGENIC disasters. So, no real interest in homogenic global warming theories, wars, and etc. (I think getting the thread diverted into current homogenic global warming theories will just be a waste of time, cause needless arguments, and take away from its purpose). This thread is about "natural" events, even if precipitated by global impact of an asteroid or comet, solar flare events, distant novas, etc. Feel free to count in huge flood events, such as that which filled up the Black Sea or events associated with the end of the last Ice Age. Lots to talk about on this subject, and some may relate to some of the "Future Lives" events that some on this forum have reported.

Anyhow, I'll get the ball rolling with this article on possible impacts by "centaur" comets--an apparently ignored source of devastation:

http://news.yahoo.com/giant-comets-may-threaten-earth-astronomers-145625835.html

Cordially,
S&S
 
SeaAndSky


Another interesting subject you have raised. The doomsday people are always talking about such things. In some ways they could be right. The possibilities of a natural disaster causing massive destruction is a real possibility.


Something I remember reading many years ago written by a scientist who studied weather patterns over hundreds of years.


He was working on a theory that in time it will be found that many (no where near all) major cities in the world because of these long term changing weather patterns will run short if not run out of water completely. That was the theory he was working on. He would have died many years ago but I wonder what he would think if he was alive today.. So there is some possibility it may not be one quick devastating event but a long drawn out event like an incurable bug. When he was working on his theory there was no such term as "climate change" but I don't think that was the object of his work. From what I remember he went around with drills that drilled into the earth a long way and looked at the soil and could see the reoccurring weather patterns over many hundreds of years The reoccurring weather patterns over many hundred's of years would not wipe out the human race but its effects would have major impacts over a period of time


Regards
 
Reading “Worlds in Collision” will give you some idea how close we possibly came to destruction in early biblical times. And, realizing the impact the overdue explosion of the Yellowstone region in the USA would have if it would be as big as the first two that make Krakatau look like Mt. St. Helens in comparison. The earth would supposedly suffer multiple global-winters where crops would fail.

As for the combatants in the Climate debate, ask them just where we are in the multi-century “ice age” cycle. You will find that they have no idea, and I would wager that plate-tectonics is also something they are not familiar with. And the claim that we can be a major influence one way or another is really without merit. You might also ask those combatants what the optimum level of co2 (a minor greenhouse gas) is the healthiest for life on earth. And, how that compares to present levels.

Just as the fellow John Tat spoke of probably never heard about “primary water” which may or may not exist in abundance. I would agree with John about the smallest of things as being a probable demise for us.

The folks behind the geo-engineering of our atmosphere claim to be helping human-kind somehow, but I wonder what their true motives are. There are many things going on that could be fatal to mankind.

Some stories about Atlantis indicate that their governing body sought more and more power and experimented widely in areas that produced bad results – similar to what most governments have been doing in the last forty years and what Monsanto and others are doing now.
 
I did quite a bit of research into this a few years ago. You can read my book on my blog or buy a copy at lulu.com, but I'm not here to promote it so ask in PMs.

Most of the earth's water is in the southern hemisphere, while almost all of the earth's land masses are in the northern hemisphere. The last ice age spanned thousands of years and consisted of long periods of freezing interspersed with short periods of warming. This caused most of the ocean's waters to become tied up in glaciers, followed by intense flooding when they melted. Most life on the planet will be found at the areas where water meets land, due to those areas being the most life-sustaining ones. Unfortunately, they're also the places that get hit the hardest by the flooding and intense weather changes.

When glaciers form in the north, they put heavy strains on the earth's crust as the weight of the ice builds up. At some point, the weight gets to e too much and the glaciers break off and cause tsunamis followed by long periods of flooding as the ice melts in the warmer seas. This initiates a warmer glacial period and things start to warm up all over (the glaciers were previously reflecting much of the sun's heat but now they aren't). The sudden break can also cause earthquakes and other tectonic activity from all the pressure. The edges of the tectonic plates happen to be located along the land/water borders where life tends to gravitate.

If a comet or large asteroid happened to pass close enough to the earth during a glacial period, it could cause enough disturbance to initiate a global catastrophe.

On a side note, while many believe that the ancient megaliths we find scattered across the globe were constructed as mere measuring devices for planting crops or studying the stars, I contend that they were built for the specific purpose of monitoring the position of the earth's poles after already having suffered a pole shift, for which evidence exists. They were afraid of future disasters. They built these megaliths on very solid ground, they used construction methods that would withstand earthquakes, and they were very concerned with the precise position of the earth in relation to the stars. There is very little to show that their interest in the stars went beyond this simple purpose. They had no great interest in astronomy for astronomy's sake, and even astrological considerations are short of evidence beyond there being a concern for outside forces playing on the planet as a whole. Only our modern interpretations of the evidence and the need to fit these ''primitive' people into our preconceptions that leads us to the conclusion that they went to all that trouble for such simple reasons.
 
Interesting stuff Anthony, but just a quick question; how would studying the stars help to predict a pole-reversal? Or did the peoples who constructed these sites just think that measuring the stars would predict a pole-reversal, but in reality was not possible?

It is quite a while since I studied Geology, so am a little rusty, but I do remember learning about pole-reversals and tracing palaeo-reversals in seafloor basalts.
 
Anthony Forwood said:
...The edges of the tectonic plates happen to be located along the land/water borders where life tends to gravitate...
A lot of subduction occurs in coastal areas, but not all. India is still pushing into Asia for instance. Also, most plates "grow" in areas submerged under the oceans.

As for helz-belz question, I would assume that building a structure that aligned to a star, North or South, would verify whether or not a change occurred in "crust" position.
 
KenJ said:
As for helz-belz question, I would assume that building a structure that aligned to a star, North or South, would verify whether or not a change occurred.
That's the thing, a pole-reversal does not change any of the relative positions of the earth and it's landmasses to the stars. A pole-shift is the movement of the magnetic north pole to the position of the magnetic south pole, and visa-versa. The positions of the landmasses do not change, and neither does the position of the earth relative to the stars. The magnetic poles actually wander around slightly (within the vicinity of the poles) all the time without causing any major issues.


There is debate about just how a pole-reversal occurs, and what the short-term effects might be for the earth's biosphere, but the geological record shows that it has happened many, many, many times, they have not had any effect on the cycles of plate tectonics, and life has continued.


Of course, if a pole-reversal does occur, a magnet is the best way to measure this, as the 'north' point of the magnet will point towards the south rather than the north. Maybe the ancients used magnets in this way. But measuring the positions of the stars will not indicate if a pole-reversal has occurred.
 
helz_belz said:
Interesting stuff Anthony, but just a quick question; how would studying the stars help to predict a pole-reversal? Or did the peoples who constructed these sites just think that measuring the stars would predict a pole-reversal, but in reality was not possible?
It is quite a while since I studied Geology, so am a little rusty, but I do remember learning about pole-reversals and tracing palaeo-reversals in seafloor basalts.
They weren't 'studying' the stars, they were keeping measure of the alignments so that during the ongoing earth changes they would be able to tell if the earth was shifting and in what way. There was no pole reversal, per se. The poles shifted only slightly, but it was enough to be quite noticeable and cause a lot of problems for any civilizations in existence. That's when they would have built these structures, not before.


Consider the idea that tectonic or pole shifting had already occurred several times over a relatively short period (i.e. hundreds of years), and this was most obvious by the change in the starscape. The ancient scientists would have put their heads together to come up with some way of dealing with the surmounting threat that the entire world was going to turn belly up and throw everything topsy tervy. They couldn't exactly hold it all in place, but they could at least determine which way it was going and whether or not it was stabilizing itself. The stone structures were made to last many generations, since the glacial cataclysms were going on for such long periods. They had to remain stationary even under great duress, in order that the meaurements were accurate. These structures were meant to serve many generations, until the ice age ended, which they had no idea it ever would. These cataclysms didn't just happen once and all of a sudden. They took place again and again over many thousands of years, but the pole shifting itself was an event that occurred only a few times during all of this. The pole shifting affected the whole world, whereas the major cataclysms were more localized to certain areas.


If you look at where all these structures are, you will find that many of them sit at the very edges of the major plates that shifted during the worst of the cataclysms during that time. A number of sites in South America are quite spectacular for the fact that they sit on a mountain range that rose up 10-12 thousand feet in a very short time (legends say it happened in one night), and evidence shows that the area was once a salt-water sea bed. The structure at Puma Punku, which is in this area, reveals stonework that far surpasses anything you might expect, and is certainly not the work of the people who live there. They claim the site was already there when they arrived thousands of years ago. There are also what appear to be docks for ships, and yet the nearest body of water is several miles away at Lake Titicaca. The site shows signs that it suffered a major earthquake at some point (undoubtedly when the mountains rose), but the structure is built with blocks of stone that fit together so well that it was able to withstand it with very little damage.


I could go on detailing many other pieces of evidence, but it really requires some study of all of it to really begin to understand what might have taken place back then. I just find it too simplistic and a lot of overkill to build these structures just to study the stars for the sake of studying stars when all of this calamity was going on - and with no explanation for how they moved those stones, and so unnecessarily when a stick in the ground would have worked just as well.
 
helz_belz said:
That's the thing, a pole-reversal does not change any of the relative positions of the earth and it's landmasses to the stars. A pole-shift is the movement of the magnetic north pole to the position of the magnetic south pole, and visa-versa.
A pole 'reversal' will conceivably keep alignments the same while the poles themselves switch. A pole 'shift' is different, in that the poles wander (as you state below) out of their normal position, causing the earth's spin to change its axis of rotation. Such a change will cause a change in the starscape.

helz_belz said:
The positions of the landmasses do not change, and neither does the position of the earth relative to the stars. The magnetic poles actually wander around slightly (within the vicinity of the poles) all the time without causing any major issues.
Geological evidence shows that there were two major pole shifts, one placing the north pole somewhere in Hudson's Bay (at least 9600 BC), and an earlier one that placed it somewhere in the Yukon Territories (several thousands of years earlier).
 
I should add that a pole shift eventually sorts itself out, just like a spinning top will reright itself after being nudged off balance. I believe that this is what the ancient scientists were aware of and were looking for. Once the poles had rerighted themselves, they knew that things were going to get better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait, I think I get where you are coming from. We are talking about two different poles, yes? The magnetic poles, that wander around all the time and occassionally switch places; and the geographical poles of the earth rotation. Am I right or have I misunderstood?


And is this the hypothesis we are discussing? Pole shift hypothesis


I plan on doing some reading up on this over the next few days (like I said, its been a long time since I studied geology and I've gotten a little rusty)
 
helz_belz said:
I plan on doing some reading up on this over the next few days (like I said, its been a long time since I studied geology and I've gotten a little rusty)
Yes helz_belz, we're talking about a geological shift, not just a magnetic one. Charles Hapgood was the main proponent of this theory, and I rely on him for the basic hypothesis. The wikipedia article you linked to barely scratches the surface of the subject and (typical of wiki) discredits it with a single reference to an obscure paper by two unknown scientists. OMG
 
Okay, more news on this front. First, read this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...gs-confirm-comet-struck-earth-10950bc-wiping/

Fresh confirmation for the collision that may have ended Atlantis or at least been one of the collisions that led to its eventual destruction. (Actually, its remnants may not have finally disappeared beneath the waves for thousands of years after this--but still part of the process).

Second, here is a site that supposedly tracks comet collision info: http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/4related.html

The main page has a header stating that we're headed for another by this August-October, 2017, with additional links: http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/index.html

Anyhow, may be junk, but the whole topic continues to crop up, including in a new thread dealing with this type of thing.

S&S

PS--Maybe it is just coincidental that some of the richest folks in the world are on an underground "luxury" shelter buying spree. Hmmm. Do they know something they're not telling us?
 
I just glanced at the last link you provided. Dr. Barry Warmkessel? Credits himself in that link, the predictions outdated - did any come true?. (I only glanced) Show me his PhD credentials to call himself Dr. That article ends with Bible quotes too. Odd mixture IMHO.

VULCAN, COMETS AND THE IMPENDING CATASTROPHE
15 Mar. 2017
MIRROR SITE
MAJOR COMET FRAGMENT IMPACT EVENT AS EARLY AS AUGUST - OCTOBER 2017

THREAT LEVEL
01/01/17 to 07/01/17

I like Gregg Braden's viewpoint. He says we are in a cycle and the cycles can be traced back scientifically for millions of years (earth changes and civilization). He showed a graph when I heard him speak about it last year. A DEEP TRUTH FROM GREGG ~~"An entire way of life has vanished, and we’ve never had an opportunity to mourn its passing so that we can let it go." It's each person's choice to embrace change and to ACT not react to it.

Some sources like to use the FEAR factor like Dr BW - False Evidence Appearing Real. Depends on the reporter's POV.

Again my hasty humble opinion. ;)
 
Well, I note that this thread did not go very far, nothing shaking here. I would have imagined that some here with their past lives regression experiences would have perchance recalled a life or two in these remote past times, when some sort of major earth-change may have occurred, and come forth with a story or two to shed some light on it. I'm aware that there are many claims out there about people remembering past lives in Atlantis and Lemuria, and of course we have Edgar Cayce's many readings about people he gave readings to, telling many of them of their previous reincarnatons in Atlantis. And although Plato was the only and original source for the tale of Atlantis, I find it puzzling how Plato's Atlantis, over the last 150 years or so, came to be something completely alien to Plato's own Description, And even more puzzling how most today accept these strange notions of an Atlantis more inline with the Esoteric teachings of Helena Blavatsky, and Cayce's readings on it. But I do not wonder that Cayce gave us both reincarnation and Atlantis, because both are contained in Plato's work.

I would be curious to see how soul learning, as claimed as the purpose of incarnation on earth, coincides with the historical development of human knowledge and civilization, especially as related to this thread and the concept of earth-changes and the devastating effects that are conjectured to have obliterated past civilizations to such an extent that we moderns have little or nothing to go on, except perhaps some ancients myths taken from oblivion, such as the Atlantis myth, or some of the more modern myths, like the ancient aliens advocates and their usual; "What if it were true" claims, as to aliens being responsible for the advanced technology that gave us those large megalithic structures, like Stonehenge, Pyramids, and other places around the globe, where our ancient alien experts have taken us to argue that humans on earth were not capable of such feats without the help of more advanced ETS.

And as far has Hapgood's theory, it rests in peace with him. Some who are Atlantis seekers, and have proposed Antarctica as the location of Atlantis, very neatly use Hapgood's wild and debunked theory to make their case. And if the earth were ever to flip over, where our friends down under would find themselves on top and those of us in the northern hemisphere find ourselves down under, or if the earth were simply to change its directional rotation, then we would not need any megalithic structures to tells us what happened, as another ancient myth would be sufficient for that.


STRANGER: I think that we may have a little amusement; there is a famous
tale, of which a good portion may with advantage be interwoven, and then we
may resume our series of divisions, and proceed in the old path until we arrive
at the desired summit. Shall we do as I say?
YOUNG SOCRATES: By all means.
STRANGER: Listen, then, to a tale which a child would love to hear; and
you are not too old for childish amusement.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Let me hear.
STRANGER: There did really happen, and will again happen, like many
other events of which ancient tradition has preserved the record, the portent
which is traditionally said to have occurred in the quarrel of Atreus and Thyes-
tes. You have heard, no doubt, and remember what they say happened at that
time?
YOUNG SOCRATES: I suppose you to mean the token of the birth of the
golden lamb.
STRANGER: No, not that; but another part of the story, which tells how
the sun and the stars once rose in the west, and set in the east, and that the god
reversed their motion, and gave them that which they now have as a testimony
to the right of Atreus.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes; there is that legend also.
STRANGER: Again, we have been often told of the reign of Cronos.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes, very often.
STRANGER: Did you ever hear that the men of former times were earth-
born, and not begotten of one another?
YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes, that is another old tradition.
STRANGER: All these stories, and ten thousand others which are still more
wonderful, have a common origin; many of them have been lost in the lapse of
ages, or are repeated only in a disconnected form; but the origin of them is what
no one has told, and may as well be told now; for the tale is suited to throw
light on the nature of the king.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Very good; and I hope that you will give the whole
story, and leave out nothing.
STRANGER: Listen, then. There is a time when God himself guides and
helps to roll the world in its course; and there is a time, on the completion of a
certain cycle, when he lets go, and the world being a living creature, and having
originally received intelligence from its author and creator, turns about and by
an inherent necessity revolves in the opposite direction.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Why is that?
STRANGER: Why, because only the most divine things of all remain ever
unchanged and the same, and body is not included in this class. Heaven and
the universe, as we have termed them, although they have been endowed by the
Creator with many glories, partake of a bodily nature, and therefore cannot be
entirely free from perturbation. But their motion is, as far as possible, single
and in the same place, and of the same kind; and is therefore only subject to
a reversal, which is the least alteration possible. For the lord of all moving
things is alone able to move of himself; and to think that he moves them at one
time in one direction and at another time in another is blasphemy. Hence we
must not say that the world is either self-moved always, or all made to go round
by God in two opposite courses; or that two Gods, having opposite purposes,
make it move round. But as I have already said (and this is the only remaining
alternative) the world is guided at one time by an external power which is divine
and receives fresh life and immortality from the renewing hand of the Creator,
and again, when let go, moves spontaneously, being set free at such a time as
to have, during infinite cycles of years, a reverse movement: this is due to its
perfect balance, to its vast size, and to the fact that it turns on the smallest
pivot.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Your account of the world seems to be very reasonable
indeed.
STRANGER: Let us now reflect and try to gather from what has been said
the nature of the phenomenon which we affirmed to be the cause of all these
wonders. It is this.
YOUNG SOCRATES: What?
STRANGER: The reversal which takes place from time to time of the motion
of the universe.
YOUNG SOCRATES: How is that the cause?
STRANGER: Of all changes of the heavenly motions, we may consider this
to be the greatest and most complete.
YOUNG SOCRATES: I should imagine so.
STRANGER: And it may be supposed to result in the greatest changes to
the human beings who are the inhabitants of the world at the time.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Such changes would naturally occur.
STRANGER: And animals, as we know, survive with difficulty great and
serious changes of many different kinds when they come upon them at once.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Very true.
STRANGER: Hence there necessarily occurs a great destruction of them,
which extends also to the life of man; few survivors of the race are left, and those
who remain become the subjects of several novel and remarkable phenomena,
and of one in particular, which takes place at the time when the transition is
made to the cycle opposite to that in which we are now living............
 
Last edited:
..........
YOUNG SOCRATES: What is it?
STRANGER: The life of all animals first came to a standstill, and the mortal
nature ceased to be or look older, and was then reversed and grew young and
delicate; the white locks of the aged darkened again, and the cheeks the bearded
man became smooth, and recovered their former bloom; the bodies of youths
in their prime grew softer and smaller, continually by day and night returning
and becoming assimilated to the nature of a newly-born child in mind as well as
body; in the succeeding stage they wasted away and wholly disappeared. And
the bodies of those who died by violence at that time quickly passed through
the like changes, and in a few days were no more seen.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Then how, Stranger, were the animals created in
those days; and in what way were they begotten of one another?
STRANGER: It is evident, Socrates, that there was no such thing in the then
order of nature as the procreation of animals from one another; the earth-born
race, of which we hear in story, was the one which existed in those days–they
rose again from the ground; and of this tradition, which is now-a-days often
unduly discredited, our ancestors, who were nearest in point of time to the end
of the last period and came into being at the beginning of this, are to us the
heralds. And mark how consistent the sequel of the tale is; after the return of
age to youth, follows the return of the dead, who are lying in the earth, to life;
simultaneously with the reversal of the world the wheel of their generation has
been turned back, and they are put together and rise and live in the opposite
order, unless God has carried any of them away to some other lot. According
to this tradition they of necessity sprang from the earth and have the name of
earth-born, and so the above legend clings to them.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Certainly that is quite consistent with what has pre-
ceded; but tell me, was the life which you said existed in the reign of Cronos in
that cycle of the world, or in this? For the change in the course of the stars and
the sun must have occurred in both.
STRANGER: I see that you enter into my meaning;–no, that blessed and
spontaneous life does not belong to the present cycle of the world, but to the
previous one, in which God superintended the whole revolution of the universe;
and the several parts the universe were distributed under the rule of certain
inferior deities, as is the way in some places still. There were demigods, who
were the shepherds of the various species and herds of animals, and each one was
in all respects sufficient for those of whom he was the shepherd; neither was there
any violence, or devouring of one another, or war or quarrel among them; and I
might tell of ten thousand other blessings, which belonged to that dispensation.
The reason why the life of man was, as tradition says, spontaneous, is as follows:
In those days God himself was their shepherd, and ruled over them, just as
man, who is by comparison a divine being, still rules over the lower animals.
Under him there were no forms of government or separate possession of women
and children; for all men rose again from the earth, having no memory of the
past. And although they had nothing of this sort, the earth gave them fruits
in abundance, which grew on trees and shrubs unbidden, and were not planted
by the hand of man. And they dwelt naked, and mostly in the open air, for the
temperature of their seasons was mild; and they had no beds, but lay on soft
couches of grass, which grew plentifully out of the earth. Such was the life of
man in the days of Cronos, Socrates; the character of our present life, which is
said to be under Zeus, you know from your own experience. Can you, and will
you, determine which of them you deem the happier?
YOUNG SOCRATES: Impossible.
STRANGER: Then shall I determine for you as well as I can?
YOUNG SOCRATES: By all means.
STRANGER: Suppose that the nurslings of Cronos, having this boundless
leisure, and the power of holding intercourse, not only with men, but with
the brute creation, had used all these advantages with a view to philosophy,
conversing with the brutes as well as with one another, and learning of every
nature which was gifted with any special power, and was able to contribute
some special experience to the store of wisdom, there would be no difficulty in
deciding that they would be a thousand times happier than the men of our own
day. Or, again, if they had merely eaten and drunk until they were full, and told
stories to one another and to the animals–such stories as are now attributed to
them–in this case also, as I should imagine, the answer would be easy. But until
some satisfactory witness can be found of the love of that age for knowledge and
discussion, we had better let the matter drop, and give the reason why we have
unearthed this tale, and then we shall be able to get on. In the fulness of time,
when the change was to take place, and the earth-born race had all perished,
and every soul had completed its proper cycle of births and been sown in the
earth her appointed number of times, the pilot of the universe let the helm go,
and retired to his place of view; and then Fate and innate desire reversed the
motion of the world. Then also all the inferior deities who share the rule of
the supreme power, being informed of what was happening, let go the parts
of the world which were under their control. And the world turning round
with a sudden shock, being impelled in an opposite direction from beginning
to end, was shaken by a mighty earthquake, which wrought a new destruction
of all manner of animals. Afterwards, when sufficient time had elapsed, the
tumult and confusion and earthquake ceased, and the universal creature, once
more at peace, attained to a calm, and settled down into his own orderly and
accustomed course, having the charge and rule of himself and of all the creatures
which are contained in him, and executing, as far as he remembered them, the
instructions of his Father and Creator, more precisely at first, but afterwords
with less exactness. The reason of the falling off was the admixture of matter
in him; this was inherent in the primal nature, which was full of disorder, until
attaining to the present order. From God, the constructor, the world received
all that is good in him, but from a previous state came elements of evil and
unrighteousness, which, thence derived, first of all passed into the world, and
were then transmitted to the animals. While the world was aided by the pilot in
nurturing the animals, the evil was small, and great the good which he produced,
but after the separation, when the world was let go, at first all proceeded well
enough; but, as time went on, there was more and more forgetting, and the
old discord again held sway and burst forth in full glory; and at last small
was the good, and great was the admixture of evil, and there was a danger
of universal ruin to the world, and to the things contained in him. Wherefore
God, the orderer of all, in his tender care, seeing that the world was in great
straits, and fearing that all might be dissolved in the storm and disappear in
infinite chaos, again seated himself at the helm; and bringing back the elements
which had fallen into dissolution and disorder to the motion which had prevailed
under his dispensation, he set them in order and restored them, and made the
world imperishable and immortal. And this is the whole tale, of which the
first part will suffice to illustrate the nature of the king. For when the world
turned towards the present cycle of generation, the age of man again stood still,
and a change opposite to the previous one was the result. The small creatures
which had almost disappeared grew in and stature, and the newly-born children
of the earth became grey and died and sank into the earth again. All things
changed, imitating and following the condition of the universe, and of necessity
agreeing with that in their mode of conception and generation and nurture; for
no animal was any longer allowed to come into being in the earth through the
agency of other creative beings, but as the world was ordained to be the lord of
his own progress, in like manner the parts were ordained to grow and generate
and give nourishment, as far as they could, of themselves, impelled by a similar
movement. And so we have arrived at the real end of this discourse; for although
there might be much to tell of the lower animals, and of the condition out of
which they changed and of the causes of the change, about men there is not
much, and that little is more to the purpose. Deprived of the care of God, who
had possessed and tended them, they were left helpless and defenceless, and
were torn in pieces by the beasts, who were naturally fierce and had now grown
wild. And in the first ages they were still without skill or resource; the food
which once grew spontaneously had failed, and as yet they knew not how to
procure it, because they had never felt the pressure of necessity. For all these
reasons they were in a great strait; wherefore also the gifts spoken of in the old
tradition were imparted to man by the gods, together with so much teaching
and education as was indispensable; fire was given to them by Prometheus, the
arts by Hephaestus and his fellow-worker, Athene, seeds and plants by others.
From these is derived all that has helped to frame human life; since the care
of the Gods, as I was saying, had now failed men, and they had to order their
course of life for themselves, and were their own masters, just like the universal
creature whom they imitate and follow, ever changing, as he changes, and ever
living and growing, at one time in one manner, and at another time in another.
Enough of the story, which may be of use in showing us how greatly we erred
in the delineation of the king and the statesman in our previous discourse.
 
This thread is related to the ancient civilizations thread. The question that comes up with regard to civilizations of the past that disappeared is: what happened? Well, obviously, we can often take some clues from history showing droughts, climate change, conquest, etc. But when things get far enough back, these become very "iffy". We also have the issue of our own civilization's demise to think about. What did them in might also do us in.

However, the emphasis here is on "natural"--not HOMOGENIC disasters. So, no real interest in homogenic global warming theories, wars, and etc. (I think getting the thread diverted into current homogenic global warming theories will just be a waste of time, cause needless arguments, and take away from its purpose). This thread is about "natural" events, even if precipitated by global impact of an asteroid or comet, solar flare events, distant novas, etc. Feel free to count in huge flood events, such as that which filled up the Black Sea or events associated with the end of the last Ice Age. Lots to talk about on this subject, and some may relate to some of the "Future Lives" events that some on this forum have reported.

Anyhow, I'll get the ball rolling with this article on possible impacts by "centaur" comets--an apparently ignored source of devastation:

http://news.yahoo.com/giant-comets-may-threaten-earth-astronomers-145625835.html

Cordially,
S&S
I am meandering through some old threads. Yes, Wise Up on Youtube covers a lot about remains often classed not as buildings but as natural formations, when if you look it is clear they are now buildings/tunnels misshapen by floods, earthquakes etc.

He doesn't like to repeat himself so his later videos could leave people wondering what he is on about. I found him when he made the video "Do you see what I see?", and I did. Watched all since and some earlier ones.

Many comments by builders, architects, engineers, carpenters agree with what he points out, and some even add to and go into explanation of techniques clearly used which are still used now, millenia later.

He doesn't go into various peoples (races) and throws off any comments that start on the Afrofascist or White Supremicist arguments. He concentrates on what the archeologists either don't see, or won't say. Very interesting channel.

The only YT channel of the genre where I agree with a good 95% of what he thinks (and he does admit when he thinks he made a mistake, which is a very genuine thing to do). Well worth a look-in.

Best wishes,

Angie
 
I did quite a bit of research into this a few years ago. You can read my book on my blog or buy a copy at lulu.com, but I'm not here to promote it so ask in PMs.

Most of the earth's water is in the southern hemisphere, while almost all of the earth's land masses are in the northern hemisphere. The last ice age spanned thousands of years and consisted of long periods of freezing interspersed with short periods of warming. This caused most of the ocean's waters to become tied up in glaciers, followed by intense flooding when they melted. Most life on the planet will be found at the areas where water meets land, due to those areas being the most life-sustaining ones. Unfortunately, they're also the places that get hit the hardest by the flooding and intense weather changes.

When glaciers form in the north, they put heavy strains on the earth's crust as the weight of the ice builds up. At some point, the weight gets to e too much and the glaciers break off and cause tsunamis followed by long periods of flooding as the ice melts in the warmer seas. This initiates a warmer glacial period and things start to warm up all over (the glaciers were previously reflecting much of the sun's heat but now they aren't). The sudden break can also cause earthquakes and other tectonic activity from all the pressure. The edges of the tectonic plates happen to be located along the land/water borders where life tends to gravitate.

If a comet or large asteroid happened to pass close enough to the earth during a glacial period, it could cause enough disturbance to initiate a global catastrophe.

On a side note, while many believe that the ancient megaliths we find scattered across the globe were constructed as mere measuring devices for planting crops or studying the stars, I contend that they were built for the specific purpose of monitoring the position of the earth's poles after already having suffered a pole shift, for which evidence exists. They were afraid of future disasters. They built these megaliths on very solid ground, they used construction methods that would withstand earthquakes, and they were very concerned with the precise position of the earth in relation to the stars. There is very little to show that their interest in the stars went beyond this simple purpose. They had no great interest in astronomy for astronomy's sake, and even astrological considerations are short of evidence beyond there being a concern for outside forces playing on the planet as a whole. Only our modern interpretations of the evidence and the need to fit these ''primitive' people into our preconceptions that leads us to the conclusion that they went to all that trouble for such simple reasons.
I believe you are right. However, it seems as though surviting generations lost the purpose of megaliths such as standing stones and created religious beliefs and rituals around them. I think a lot of standing stones were pre-diluvian (for want of a better term).

Added to that, academia and the superstitious like to attach meanings beyond the simply practical. It would be interesting to read more threads than the one or two i've found of people who have recalled pl's from those earlier eras.

Best wishes,

Angie
 
A pole 'reversal' will conceivably keep alignments the same while the poles themselves switch. A pole 'shift' is different, in that the poles wander (as you state below) out of their normal position, causing the earth's spin to change its axis of rotation. Such a change will cause a change in the starscape.


Geological evidence shows that there were two major pole shifts, one placing the north pole somewhere in Hudson's Bay (at least 9600 BC), and an earlier one that placed it somewhere in the Yukon Territories (several thousands of years earlier).
Thus; https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/01/02/piri-reis-map-of-1513/

Best wishes,

Angela
 
In the end, I believe it will boil down to one thing: exponential growth in a limited world is not possible. Once we run out of or run low on several important resources such as oil, coal, gas and rare earth minerals, we are going to hit a sort of ceiling. Potable water may well play a role too. The available resources will not be enough to go around. Our dependence upon oil in particular is scary. Nobody knows how to make do without it anymore. People will starve and die. We hit peak production a decade ago. Meaning it takes between 20-30 years before it takes more energy to get the oil out of the ground, transporting and processing it than the energy it provides. We are going to run out, the question is just when. I believe we are looking at the beginnings of it.

When one country after another runs dry, there will be desperation and conflict between haves and have-nots. How bad that gets is anyone's guess. Nuclear exchange? Not off the board. But we will still run out and lots of people will die from a wide variety of reasons. I believe the linchpin in this agenda - which is called Agenda 21 - will be the oil depletion. I believe it is all planned. We could have quit oil almost century ago, but there are very powerful globalist interests that do not want that. Because they want to reduce earth's population to below 500 million. There are lots of wheels within wheels and interconnecting parts on that one. But the overarching goal has the name Agenda 21 as agreed upon in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 by the UN countries. Absolutely terrible stuff hidden within flowery Newspeak about 'lowering our footprint' and whatnot. If anybody with a brain reads it, it is terrifying.

I hope this is not preaching. While I am reasonably bloody certain of what I am saying, my conclusions about the collected information are of course my own. Some things are guesses, however qualified, due to years of delving into things that we wage slaves in the West are not supposed to know or talk about. Please beware of what is coming and please do not be rude. If I am wrong in the end, and I hope I am, then by all means, tell me to put on that tinfoil hat. Not that I will need it in my EMP-safe Faraday cage...
 
In the end, I believe it will boil down to one thing: exponential growth in a limited world is not possible. Once we run out of or run low on several important resources such as oil, coal, gas and rare earth minerals, we are going to hit a sort of ceiling. Potable water may well play a role too. The available resources will not be enough to go around. Our dependence upon oil in particular is scary. Nobody knows how to make do without it anymore. People will starve and die. We hit peak production a decade ago. Meaning it takes between 20-30 years before it takes more energy to get the oil out of the ground, transporting and processing it than the energy it provides. We are going to run out, the question is just when. I believe we are looking at the beginnings of it.

When one country after another runs dry, there will be desperation and conflict between haves and have-nots. How bad that gets is anyone's guess. Nuclear exchange? Not off the board. But we will still run out and lots of people will die from a wide variety of reasons. I believe the linchpin in this agenda - which is called Agenda 21 - will be the oil depletion. I believe it is all planned. We could have quit oil almost century ago, but there are very powerful globalist interests that do not want that. Because they want to reduce earth's population to below 500 million. There are lots of wheels within wheels and interconnecting parts on that one. But the overarching goal has the name Agenda 21 as agreed upon in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 by the UN countries. Absolutely terrible stuff hidden within flowery Newspeak about 'lowering our footprint' and whatnot. If anybody with a brain reads it, it is terrifying.

I hope this is not preaching. While I am reasonably bloody certain of what I am saying, my conclusions about the collected information are of course my own. Some things are guesses, however qualified, due to years of delving into things that we wage slaves in the West are not supposed to know or talk about. Please beware of what is coming and please do not be rude. If I am wrong in the end, and I hope I am, then by all means, tell me to put on that tinfoil hat. Not that I will need it in my EMP-safe Faraday cage...
The first prototype fuel cell was developed in 1803. The inventor couldn't secure funding to take it further (surprise). Some of the oldest cars were electric. Reportedly, there were a lot of re-charging points in some major American cities (I have a thing for beautiful early vehicles - not pl related). I think we all know there was no need to pillage Earth and other animal life as it has been pillaged although I often question the genetic/spiritual dark programming that prevents enough of us turning and totally disempowering the power/warmongers that orchestrate it - for millenia under different guises. I also know that to be able to achieve nearly all of their protocols (unwritten before written), over at least one millenia since 'Andiluvian' times, working toward their aims generation after generation, they must have access to some dark powerful energy (the 'devil'?). There could be no other way for a relatively few people to achieve so much over so long. I would think those people believe in reincarnation and that they also can return to being reborn into the same few families and so be the ones who they believe will ultimately rule the world. I have to be careful here as I and another recently strayed into politics on another thread and we were (rightly) told off and our posts were removed, so I want to remain cautious.

Strangely, I mentioned 'Wise Up', Youtube, only yesterday. He doesn't go into peoples/races and throws off the Afrofascists and White Supremacists when they start, as he doesn't want distractions from what he shows. What are supposedly natural structures, but were clearly man built ruins. Evidence of what must have been heavy metal machinery in ancient times. He doesn't like to repeat himself so anyone watching from his later videos isn't likely to get what he shows. I recommend to going at least as far back as his 'Do you see what I see?' and bearing with what may at first seem ridiculous. He makes more sense as you go on. Quite a lot of comments from Engineers, builders, plumbers, carpenters and architects who not only agree with him due to their own knowledge, but explain more. We have extensive back-engineering in today's world. The thing is, if anyone remembered pl's from 'pre-antidiluvian' times, would they even be aware it was that long ago if we had similar buildings and machines as we have now? It could be that such civilisations could even be mistaken for a lives on another planet.

I recently read of a TV series shown in the USA, which unfortunately wasn't shown here and I haven't been able to find any DVD's of it (would have had to be Region 2 anyway, like the last series of Orphan Black that the BBC didn't show or make DVD's for here). The name of the series 'Altered Carbon'. With societies worlwide being darkly psychologically operated upon about 'trans', 'born a bit of each', 'gender fluid', not to mention the similar dark psy-ops throughout ALL major nations toward trans humanoids, chips in animals, chips in people, 'altered carbon' makes very uncomfortable sense - with whatever is in control somehow resending our spirits back to be imprisoned in the 'new' types of bodies being created? Are we the old AI? WHY don't we fight being made to return when we are in spirit?

Age of Aquarius in the next century. Maybe there will be another 're-set'?

Best wishes,

Angie
 
Last edited:
In the end, I believe it will boil down to one thing: exponential growth in a limited world is not possible. Once we run out of or run low on several important resources such as oil, coal, gas and rare earth minerals, we are going to hit a sort of ceiling. Potable water may well play a role too. The available resources will not be enough to go around. Our dependence upon oil in particular is scary. Nobody knows how to make do without it anymore. People will starve and die. We hit peak production a decade ago. Meaning it takes between 20-30 years before it takes more energy to get the oil out of the ground, transporting and processing it than the energy it provides. We are going to run out, the question is just when. I believe we are looking at the beginnings of it.

When one country after another runs dry, there will be desperation and conflict between haves and have-nots. How bad that gets is anyone's guess. Nuclear exchange? Not off the board. But we will still run out and lots of people will die from a wide variety of reasons. I believe the linchpin in this agenda - which is called Agenda 21 - will be the oil depletion. I believe it is all planned. We could have quit oil almost century ago, but there are very powerful globalist interests that do not want that. Because they want to reduce earth's population to below 500 million. There are lots of wheels within wheels and interconnecting parts on that one. But the overarching goal has the name Agenda 21 as agreed upon in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 by the UN countries. Absolutely terrible stuff hidden within flowery Newspeak about 'lowering our footprint' and whatnot. If anybody with a brain reads it, it is terrifying.

I hope this is not preaching. While I am reasonably bloody certain of what I am saying, my conclusions about the collected information are of course my own. Some things are guesses, however qualified, due to years of delving into things that we wage slaves in the West are not supposed to know or talk about. Please beware of what is coming and please do not be rude. If I am wrong in the end, and I hope I am, then by all means, tell me to put on that tinfoil hat. Not that I will need it in my EMP-safe Faraday cage...
N.B.
I borrowed this link from a thread started by Cryscat http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/sci...ries-passed-down-in-genes-from-ancestors.html More food for thought, as with what seems to be planned for trans this and that, and 'altered carbon' (stem cell tech?) one wonders how our spirits would be adversely affected if we return yet again? Me - I am going to truly fight against it next time. Not only be awkward and protest but all out war if there is any attempt to have me return or go anywhere I am not sure I will like.

Best wishes,

Angie
 
More bad news in regard to the increasing incidence of natural disasters:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...-magnetic-pole-is-experiencing-a-sudden-shift

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...or-eruption-would-devastate-the-entire-planet

I'm always cautious that things may be overblown, so if anyone wants to double-check and debunk, be my guest. I'm definitely eager to be proved wrong on this stuff! Anyhow, on the supervolcano, I have seen articles pointing out that even with the changes taking place, there is no proof that an eruption is imminent. However, I am somewhat concerned that whatever is going on vis-a-vis the shifting and weakening of the magnetic pole may also indicate some internal shifts that would impact the possibility of eruption. A magnetic pole shift would be bad enough. Putting the two together . . . . .
 
More bad news in regard to the increasing incidence of natural disasters:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...-magnetic-pole-is-experiencing-a-sudden-shift

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...or-eruption-would-devastate-the-entire-planet

I'm always cautious that things may be overblown, so if anyone wants to double-check and debunk, be my guest. I'm definitely eager to be proved wrong on this stuff! Anyhow, on the supervolcano, I have seen articles pointing out that even with the changes taking place, there is no proof that an eruption is imminent. However, I am somewhat concerned that whatever is going on vis-a-vis the shifting and weakening of the magnetic pole may also indicate some internal shifts that would impact the possibility of eruption. A magnetic pole shift would be bad enough. Putting the two together . . . . .
Many big changes afoot, I think. Another 're-set' perhaps? Maybe.

Best wishes,

Angie
 
Well, here's another article about the rumbling super volcano under the U.S.:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scie...thquake-today-news-map-now-usgs-earth-caldera

What if the U.S. was suddenly removed from the scene as a world power? That might seem like reason to breath a sigh of relief to many. However, overbearing as the U.S. might be on occasion, it keeps a lid on regional conflicts around the globe and keeps them from expanding beyond a certain point (at least where the interests of itself and its allies are concerned). I think you could expect wars to break out all over, Europe to be overwhelmed from the South and East, China to create the kind of "Greater East Asian Co-prosperity Sphere" that WWII Japan tried to create, and a lot of other bad stuff. But maybe I exaggerate. OTOH, the possible climate changes could also be highly disruptive. So, that is something else to consider.

S&S
 
Back
Top