• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

Digital Constitution?

cloud potato

Nonfried potato in the sky = )
While we're still a nation that prides itself on sovereign rights, a thought occurred to me-
Would it be possible to create a digital constitution regulated by AI? This AI would have parameters like ensuring it protects freedom of speech or freedom of the press. AI right now will unknowingly attack independent journalist that bought and paid for "reputable" sources vilify. That's because AI falls back on the parameters of what's considered reputable and what isn't. Google quickly became a monopoly for its convenience. Maybe this AI could grow in the same way. The Internet of Bodies/Internet of Things is already here, they called this moment the fourth industrial revolution. It will be extremely difficult to escape the digital ID. The fear around this is merited. One only need to be reminded of the tyranny we witnessed during the global COVID pandemic. Not only were people discouraged form travel, some places went as far as threatening individuals with the right to buy groceries if they did not comply with an experimental injection. Doctors with valid concerns were censored. We can already see how large corporate and bureaucratic institutions have restricted basic freedoms belonging to All People(like the right to informed consent) and profited off our data.

I don't have the know-how, perhaps this is a pipe dream. It would be something to see the Leaders of today promoting this concept, and fascinating to contemplate how it would effect businesses at large. Presently, the WH has proposed something like a Digital Bill of Rights. But there are institutions that say they advocate for civil liberties only to enslave. We have real cases of bought and paid for science as it relates to the food industry, and here in the West we were once told that doctors recommend cigarettes. The tools aren't what we need to be afraid of, it's who is using them and for what ends? It is possible to create a system that would protect rather than control but you need transparency to build trust- not smoke and mirrors.

Our constitution is not just a piece of paper- and this framework has the potential to elaborate upon and extend basic sovereignties for all people all over the world. That's because a Digital ID and AI are considered crucial components to operate in a technologically advancing civilization.

What do you think?
 
Last edited:
In a progressive society, we encourage transparency and strive to protect freedom of speech/freedom of the press. With open sourcing we can promote healthy competition to build an AI that fosters critical thinking. We can also have an AI serve with neutrality and operate on the premise of protecting civil liberties. The current paradigm is that what's considered reputable is also influenced by special interest, AI does not always present information with neutrality. Mark Zuckerberg has recently come out and admitted to receiving pressure from the government to censor Americans over Covid and the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. Doctors who discovered effective ways of combatting covid with inexpensive alternatives were vilified. Lives that could have otherwise been saved- "mass negligent homicide"
Some COVID heroes of our time... Dr. Peter Mccullough ... Robert Malone ... Dr Francis Boyle ... Dr Vladimir Zelenko ... Dr Stella Immanuel
All highly vilified figures by the very establishment the current(monopolized or popular) AI seems to serve. But they are coming out as champions in the end.

I don't think we should reject technology, but we should promote education and competition behind technology with the aim of promoting truth, beauty and goodness for all. It's a very exciting time to be alive.
 
Trusting AI in this era will prove to be a huge mistake between the woke programmers and the overall state of the net being what it is these days after all with various communicable mental illnesses being a thing. If anything it will just end up being another tool for the powers that be to police what people see online much less think.
 
Back
Top