fiziwig
moderator emeritus
I just read something very interesting by psychologist Stanislav Grof regarding karmic bonds. Working with his patients he has found that a karmic bond is released when three conditions are met. 1) complete acceptance of responsibility for the attitude that created the bond, 2) complete forgiveness of ourself and the other soul involved in the bond, 3) being forgiven by the other.
Now here's the really odd thing he discovered.
He goes on to point out that the other person in the karmic bond had undergone the same experience of release from the karmic debt, but for a completely different reason. Person A might have been lying on the analyst's couch in deep hypnotic regression while person B was riding a bus to work 600 miles away. At the moment person A felt the karmic bond had been resolved person B might have looked out the window at a beatiful sunrise scene and suddenly and inexplicably felt a deep and mysterious sense of relief and release from a burden.
This is some pretty startling and significant evidence for the reality of the karmic bond.
He also points out that in his work with past life karmic bonds it seems as if both the victim and the agressor suffer the karmic consequences. They are bonded by the experience. This explains something that has always puzzled me; why is it that past life therapy seems to discover so many cases where the victim is punished in the next life? Apparently the intensity of the experience is what creates the bond, and the bond continues to affect both souls involved in the incident until it is resolved.
The victim is not being punished. The vicitm is holding onto the experience of pain and the experience of anger or hatred toward the agressor. It is the negative effects of his own response to the incident rather than the incident itself that holds him in bondage. If someone wrongs me and I hold agrudge I create a karmic bond. If someone wrongs me and I respond with compassion and forgiveness toward him no karmic bond is created.
The implication is that not only should we seek to resolve old karmic bonds, but we should also avoid creating new ones that will have to be worked out in future incarnations.
Now here's the really odd thing he discovered.
I have observed that many individuals experienceing karmic scenes identified the protagonist in these scenes as specific people int heir lives -- parents, children, spouses, superiors, and other important figures. When they completed the reliving of the karmic pattern and reached a sense of resolution and forgiveness, they often felt that the respective partner was in some sense involved in the process and must have felt something similar.
When I became sufficiently open-minded to make attempts at verification of the relevance of these statements, I discovered to my great surprise that they are often accurate. I found out that in many instances the person whom the subject denoted as the protagonist in the karmic sequence experienced at exactly the time a dramaitc shift of attitude in the direction that was predicted by the resolution of the past incarnation pattern.
He goes on to point out that the other person in the karmic bond had undergone the same experience of release from the karmic debt, but for a completely different reason. Person A might have been lying on the analyst's couch in deep hypnotic regression while person B was riding a bus to work 600 miles away. At the moment person A felt the karmic bond had been resolved person B might have looked out the window at a beatiful sunrise scene and suddenly and inexplicably felt a deep and mysterious sense of relief and release from a burden.
This is some pretty startling and significant evidence for the reality of the karmic bond.
He also points out that in his work with past life karmic bonds it seems as if both the victim and the agressor suffer the karmic consequences. They are bonded by the experience. This explains something that has always puzzled me; why is it that past life therapy seems to discover so many cases where the victim is punished in the next life? Apparently the intensity of the experience is what creates the bond, and the bond continues to affect both souls involved in the incident until it is resolved.
The victim is not being punished. The vicitm is holding onto the experience of pain and the experience of anger or hatred toward the agressor. It is the negative effects of his own response to the incident rather than the incident itself that holds him in bondage. If someone wrongs me and I hold agrudge I create a karmic bond. If someone wrongs me and I respond with compassion and forgiveness toward him no karmic bond is created.
The implication is that not only should we seek to resolve old karmic bonds, but we should also avoid creating new ones that will have to be worked out in future incarnations.