Are they real?
Hej Shield!
You wrote:
"On the other hand I understand perfectly the wish and drive, when it comes to specifically ´remembered´ lives, to find out wether it actually physically happened..."
Yes, I am feeling an interest at the moment to know which of my 'past lifes' is real and which came out of my unconsious memories of this life or are just symbols or archetypes for stuff I am dealing with in my life now.
But that is just a personal quest, started when my therapist discounted them.But having uncovered and resolved what childhood hurts it was triggering for me about 'this' childhood, has made it a matter of interest rather than urgency now.
I don't think the above either proves or disproves reincarnation, and I am not wanting to do either

Some of the stuff I relived feels very convincing, and some didn't. I feel that some is probably genuine and some comes from symbols and childhood stuff.
What I haven't really shared here yet, is that for years I was regressing people. Some people make good hypnotic subjects and some get very little imagery, if any at all. My best friend is a very good hypnotic subject, and she got some really amazing stuff coming through.
When I was doing sessions for people, it was either that they were interested to know how they were connected with people in the present, or an attempt to work through problelms they were experiencing in their lives, but didn't want conventional therapy.
I always told them before regressing them, that I couldn't 'prove' to them that they had past lives, but that they would probably get vague imagery at the beginning and that it helped to just 'trust it' for the moment, as that often started the flow.
Since I wasn't doing this in order to research past lives, it didn't matter to me at the time whether these memories were historically correct or not. What mattered, was that they were coming from the subconcious minds of the individuals, so they had meaning, and facing and dealing with them often brought resolution to the problems in the present.
This is a valid field on its own (done by people like Edith Fiore, Brian Weiss, Joel Whitton and others) and is very different from actually researching past lives, where one has to be very critical, and do it scientifically. The only people I know who have really done that, are Helen Wambach and Ian Stevenson.
Carol Bowman's work was more in the line of helping children work through problems in their lives, but also come closer to the researcher's work in that children's minds are uncontaminated from books and movies, and when they show precocious knowledge, then a certain amout of research can be done.
Whichever is which, I think we have uncovered a very interesting phenomenon -- the fact that we seem to have consciousness that goes beyond the mere memories of this lifetime, and can often either 'relive' or 'link up with' (via the collective unconscious or 'Akashic records') stuff that comes from other times and other places.
In a post elswhere, Deborah also spoke of the difference of 'subjectively reliving' versus 'memories' (which can just be scenes from the past). I do know that in the former, I am 'back there' and am experiencing from 'inside me' (complete with sights, sounds and moving scenes). In the latter I just see pictures and they are usually static and seen from the outside.
But I don't want to put people off by saying that, because I think the first tiny bits of really connected memory can start that way, and if the person is encouraged to trust it and go with it, full reliving can often follow.
So I think what I am saying is that I feel things are not in black and white, and there is a lot we simply don't know about right now. But we are standing at the beginnings of learning important things, and this is an exciting time.
Varme Hälsningar!
Persephone