i did the same! when i was a kid, i would always refer to it as the War for Southern Independence, even tho we always lived in the Northern states. when i 1st learned about the Civil War, i was in 5th grade and argued with my teacher that the North wasnt concerned about the slaves and the issue of slavery, they were mad because the South was becoming more economically prosperous due to the amount of cotton & other major crops coming out of the South, and if the North took away the slaves it'd make the South fall behind because they couldnt do all the fieldwork themselves. she wasnt too thrilled with me.Mammatus said:I always had argued that the Civil War was not over slavery, and that the Confederate States seceded because the feds were stepping in, in places they had no business. I found out quite a bit later in what, fifth grade? That this was how the Confederates felt. And Savannah, Georgia about that era is appealing.
that was always my opinion, and i came to find out it was the opinion of quite a few Southerners around the time of the Civil War, whether it was a true fact that the North felt this way, it's an established fact that the majority of Southerners felt this way. if you go down South even today, especially the Deep South, quite a few still refer to it as the War for Southern Independence. when i was 15, i lived in Georgia and my US History teacher, when we learned about the subject, called it the War for Southern Independence too. this was southwestern GA near the FL border, so it was Deep South.
