Hello SundayAtDusk.
SundayAtDusk said:
But don't you think Hans might have been a bit unfair about his view of her? If there's not enough money, there is often not enough food. Might she had quite possibly wanted what was best for her child, in regards to survival? Would it have been better if Hans and his mother had starved to death, or he had resorted to crime to feed himself and his mother? Would it had been better that he might have ended up killed or jailed?
Yes
I can now understand what you are talking about with these statements. However, to a terrified 10/11 year old child in that world environment the situation was seen quite differently. Hans had lost his father, he & his mother were struggling, & she sent him away because he was a strain on their meager resources. Would Hans had rather resorted to petty theft in order to stay with his mother & care for the two of them versus being sent away from her? Yes. To his young mind that would have been preferable.
One also needs to realize that once Hans was placed within the group great pains were taken to keep him from his mother without his knowledge. This is how such groups work. They can then educate & raise the child according to their own discretion. Hans rarely saw his mother, mostly on the major holidays. And then even that stopped without any reason given. To Hans' mind, she had chosen to stop coming.
And it appears his mother had no idea the school she sent Hans to was a Nazi one, since she so detested the Nazis.
Again, at Hans' young age he would not have known that. And the organization raising him was certainly not going to tell him that his own mother disapproved of their practices & beliefs.
(Of course, not all mothers do want what is best for their child; there are some mothers who have deep emotional problems...just like there are fathers and children who have deep emotional problems.)
I am, indeed, glad that you recognize that some parents do not want what is best for their children. My own mother in this incarnation is proof of that fact. She has Munchausen By Proxy, among other problems, & us children suffered greatly because of it while living with her.
What evidence did Hans have that his mother did not want him to be happy and successful, that her anger wasn't strictly caused by the fact he had become a happy and successful Nazi?
By the time that Hans reached the age of 22 he was completely absorbed in the Nazi Party & its beliefs. One needs to keep the times that he was living in within context as well. The SS was considered to be a very elite group at that time. They had the snappy uniforms, they garnered respect on the street, they received special perks, etc.
Many young men yearned to be counted among the ranks of the SS, even though the criteria for joining was
very stringent. Being counted as a member of the "true Aryan elite" was something to be quite proud of for them. And with Hans being a member of the police force, becoming a member of the SS opened a lot of doors to promotion for him.
Moreover, Hans tells his mother she had better not turn up in one of his camps. He was 22 and had just "graduated" to the SS...why would he call them his?
Because he knew that he was going to working as a guard within the concentration camp system.
His statement was obviously a sign he was fantasizing doing extreme harm to his own mother
Assumptions are wonderful aren't they? I'm sure we all know what they say about making assumptions. There were no death camps at this point in time. There were concentration/prison camps. Hans did not make that statement with the thought that he would ever be running a death camp. He was a loyal member of the Nazi Party & she was quite publically, & loudly, denouncing that party. That was considered to be treason & often landed the person in....a concentration camp. He was NOT fantasizing about doing "extreme harm" to his mother. He was simply letting her know that, should she be thrown into a camp that he was working in, she would receive no special treatment or requests for release on her behalf from him.
...and you are sure this hatred of his mother was not his excuse for doing all kinds of atrocious things to other people? Your posts show Hans having no empathy for his victims, no remorse for what he did. Hans was anything but a "normal" person.
Hans did the things that he did for
many reasons. I have been posting Hans' recollections in the order that I received them. There are remorseful ones that later emerged. Unfortunately I do not know how much more of Hans' recollections I can share within this thread because it has been deemed too inappropriate for the members here to read.
Hans was trained to not have any feelings for his victims, as they were considered to be inferior to him & not even human. And you are right that Hans kept to that training (or tried to) for the vast majority of his life. However there was a part of Hans, very deep inside, that had serious trouble reconciling the actions that they were taking. This was exactly why he drank the way that he did - especially at night after the work day was done. So, yes, he did have remorse for the extreme actions that were being taken deep down.
Hans was far from being a "pillar of the community", I will grant you that. And when I say that he, & others like him, were "normal" I do not mean that they were stable. Extreme circumstances effect all people in varying ways. And, again, we must remember that these men were in no way living/training under normal conditions or circumstances. The fact of the matter is that "normal" people can, & do, still behave in such ways when they are stuck in similar circumstances.
People often make the mistake of thinking that I am trying to state that there were absolutely no truly sick, demented, or sadistic people within the Third Reich. Of course there were. There always is within such regimes. However, the vast majority of the men were
normal people reacting to extreme conditions/circumstances.
Sincerely,
Laurasia