argonne1918
Senior Registered
So here is the $64 question: Is there a past life reason for your medical problems? Have you ever looked into that? Too bad you never got to meet Roger Woolger or Helen Wambach.
Plain and simple -- religious persecution. This was not something I knew how to say as a child because it was a little complex for a 6 year old mind to fathom and express in verbal language. My parents were constantly trying to piece together the puzzle and came up with their own possible theories.argonne1918 said:So here is the $64 question: Is there a past life reason for your medical problems? Have you ever looked into that? Too bad you never got to meet Roger Woolger or Helen Wambach.
If my memory is correct about the date of the conversation I had with my Dad under a tree - the location of that tree would place it 1969-70. We only lived in that house during that period. I don't recall a name ever being used. The only thing that was significant to me - was it was a professional or expert who took the testimony of children seriously. The reason it stood out in my mind was - there were other children talking and saying what I was saying. I was not alone. The other thing was - there was an adult somewhere in the world taking children seriously. In my young mind - my attitude was - there was someone trying to 'get to the bottom' of it.argonne1918 said:Too bad you never got to meet Roger Woolger or Helen Wambach.
I was writing out the last post when you posted this question. Hope you find the answer in that. After the age of 28, I didn't like for 'spirit's' to contact me directly. To me, it is too hard on the senses. After the age of 28, I had the understanding that in order for a 'spirit' to contact me - I had to consent to it. And even then, they are not allowed to 'disturb' my 'mental block' of forgetfulness. The last person I recall trying to contact me from spirit was my Grandmother in 1998. The only reason (I feel) she broke through like she did - was due to a promise we gave to God when I was 8 years old. It was just audio and mild. She wanted to make a 'visual' appearance to me and I flatly refused. I told her I had enough contacts with spirits to last me several life times. It is not easy for me. It 'stuns' you sort of like a 'wild deer' getting caught up in the headbeams.Allen said:dking777....... you've mentioned about spirits / souls / guides coming to visit you. Once your parents passed back over to the other side, did they contact you at all with any validations or acknowledgments?
I found this interesting quote from Stevenson.argonne1918 said:And the tabloid "National Enquirer" was the only newspaper who would carry articles on reincarnation and other paranormal subjects.
It is strange how memory works. For years, I couldn't remember anything and now - I get triggered to recall vivid details of conversations I shared back 40 years ago."The National Enquirer is our enemy, because what they do is damaging. They sensationalize, distort and misrepresent," Stevenson said. "It's a shame the you're often judged by what the National Enquirer does rather than what we publish ourselves." The Freelance Star - Aug 26, 1983
For me, I felt I got that from the both of them. I feel the verbalization and acknowledgment while they were alive in the human world was far superior than anything they could have said to me as spirits. To me, if their spirits came to me and said they finally knew what I was talking about - it would have been sort of like a cop out. There is not a 'spirit' in the 'celestial scheme of things that don't know about reincarnation. Over there it is, 'so what, what else is new?"Allen said:If that's the case, then there'd be no need to come back with a 'you were right' acknowledgment.
When I was 14 my Mom went out of her way to research what she could about 'soul mates.' I was sort of stunned by it at the time and asked,Mama2HRB said:Your Mom, too, for trying to debunk those who claimed to be soulmates. Some of us have to see the proof ourselves.
When I write - I try to stay true to my childish perspective to capture that essence. I did notice that maybe I wasn't painting a fuller picture and the idea that the writings might cast them in a 'negative' light sort hurt. There were alot of issues they had to tackle from an adult perspective (which as a child) I was totally naive and blind to. Now, I feel totally blessed they were a part of my life and wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong idea because of my childish attitude back then. (After all, I was only a child back then.)Mama2HRB said:Seeing your parents through different eyes with your additional postings .....
My understanding of the prophetic promise - is - my 'spirit' will appear to her when she is a newborn. I am not going to see her while I am alive in this body.Mama2HRB said:A question, how are things with your nephew, and has Mom reappeared in a new body?
I have been working on writing down as much as I can recall about the events that took place from 1980 to 1983 where the topic of reincarnation came up many times with a small group of friends. It was not something I brought up on my own. I had 'five' friends that had passed away (three in the beginning) and their 'spirits' were pulling shenanigans to make their 'invisible presence known to my friends. The parabled expression shared about the arcade was sort of the 'end result' of many days, weeks and months of conversations. I really didn't know what to believe at the time. There was my own limited 'human point of view' and there was the point of view from the spirits of five friends who had passed over and were in-limbo awaiting a physical 'body' anew. The 'spirits', of course knew about my 'brief' recess or 'trip home' to the light in my near death experience at the age of 18. I could never find words to make any sort of sense to my own rational and logical mind - much less try to convert that 'spiritual memory' into English.Allen said:I like that. Makes me have faith in putting aside that whole 'why are we here?' or 'what is my purpose?' stuff and simply go with believing we are here each time for the experience. Whatever that experience is in any given moment, that's what we're here for. Love, pain, laughter, sorrow, bliss, whatever... the experience.
That's as good a reason as any. There's also the possibility that there is no reason at all, or that there is more than one reason.Allen said:I like that. Makes me have faith in putting aside that whole 'why are we here?' or 'what is my purpose?' stuff and simply go with believing we are here each time for the experience. Whatever that experience is in any given moment, that's what we're here for. Love, pain, laughter, sorrow, bliss, whatever... the experience.
Actually, 1983 was not the first time I had the vision. I didn't speak about directly in 1983, because I had already gone through that phase in 1981.argonne1918 said:In 1983 no one would have believed it was even possible for such a thing to happen!
I feel this quotes sums it up in a very simple manner and describes the 'three' stages involved. It is not the destination as much as it is the journey.Maya (S: illusion) In Hinduism, maya signifies the activity of Brahman in producing an illusiory or magical world in which nothing is as it seems. Maya is the mind of Brahman playing a hiding, seeking and finding game with himself. The hiding is the illusion of birth and death. The seeking is the illusory act of striving for liberation from birth and death. The finding is the realization there was never any birth or death or need for liberation from it in the first place. Encyclopedia of Reincarnation and Karma.