• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

What if language is the only difference in ideologies?

W

watchurself

New Member
what If these 2 apparently opposite ideologies are one in the same thing just diffrent "language" used to

explain it??

what if the "VAST" differences can be reconciled ?? what if both points of view are correct??



a Spiritual person's beliefs in "other Realms" or Spiritual Realms - God ??

a Scientific person's beliefs in "MULTI-VERSE's or Multiple Universe's or endless Universe's -no God


i dont buy the "religous" point of view of God - an ancient white bearded Man sitting on a throne

i also cannot accept the NO GOD approach of the pure science train of thought -with the implication that

Man and all creatures JUST HAPPENED RANDOMLY



somehow I THINK - that God is a Life Force, Like CHI and/or Prana and an Energy Source

somehow i think no one has it completely right or wrong - the truth lies somewhere in the middle

all i know is - GOD IS - IMO

i highly doubt that we are here due to RANDOM LUCK -with no meaning

WHAT DO YOU THINK ????
 
watchurself said:
what if the "VAST" differences can be reconciled ?? what if both points of view are correct??
Click to expand...
I have come to believe that what is commonly viewed as two polar opposites—Religion vs. Science—are actually both very similar in that they are mutually clumsy attempts to define the meaning of life. I also think that both very often miss the point of life by trying to establish dogmatic principles and rules of nature to which we must adhere, rather than learning the real truth in our own creative way. In so doing we find that the truth does not really lie somewhere in the middle, but rather wherever we each as individuals happen to find it.


For me it does not matter whether there is a God, or that the so-called laws of physics no longer work at the quantum level, for I worship neither. What matters most is that we should not feel chained to the proverbial cave wall of Plato's Republic, and that we should feel free to experience all the phenomenon that are available in the world by whatever means of perception available to us.
 
I agree except that i DO "FEEL" Love from the "Universe"


it's something so intangiable that i cant explain it


but i just cant see a Random uncaring Universe as the explanantion ???


Like in the Movie Contact - when Jodie Foster came back and couldnt explain to the people but she KNEW there was "contact" and it was friendly (and Loving?) because she had experienced it


i cant prove it - but I "FEEL" Love from the Universe?

Nightrain said:
For me it does not matter whether there is a God, or that the so-called laws of physics no longer work at the quantum level, for I worship neither. .
Click to expand...
 
Science is beholden to verifiable proof, and the reliance on said proof leaves one without 99 percent of available opportunities for usable truths...there are simply no proofs to be had. I see religion demanding absolute faith in truths I do not hold, although it also provides a larger percentage of available truths which are amenable to my sensibilities. I am not sure how close the ultimate differences are to each other through any prism of comparison, but I think over time we each develop truths which give us a schematic of how our individual illusion of reality works for us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top