Hi John,
I think the difference is really one of emphasis, and maybe the immediacy of contact with the inner voice or self. It seems to me that, either way, a person is almost always going to end up with a two step process.
For example, you are getting lots of messages from what you consider to be your true self that you cannot understand. To try and understand these messages, you are benefited sometimes by seeking external knowledge. E.g., you have done so with regard to some of the symbols you have seen and the word/name you heard in meditation, and have received what you considered to be valuable information regarding ancient Egyptian beliefs in response to your inquiries (mostly from Blueheart) on your "Receiving Information from a Source" thread. Blueheart, like me, answered you based on knowledge gained from books and/or the internet. So, you are also finding the two-step process helpful at times.
One difference might be that you are starting with the inner revelation and then seeking help from time-to-time in outer sources in terms of understanding the revelation. It could be argued that others are approaching the matter from the other direction (and from your perspective--backwards) by seeking insights in books, etc. and then relying on an internal witness or resonance to verify what is correct, etc. This also means that they are, so to speak, keeping themselves more "distant" from the true source of information/revelation (at least from your perspective).
From my standpoint, I think that different people will inevitably be different in their approach. I also think that you have to take into account the "urging" of the inner self that directs people towards certain reading. So, we're not just reading at random and depending on our inner voice to highlight the good spots. I think our inner guide is active in guiding us towards certain reading and then highlighting the best out of it.
I could say more, but that's enough for now.
Cordially,
S&S