My favorite question is "what am I here and now for?"After praying to God, "What is reality?" and having the experience shared above
My favorite question is "what am I here and now for?"After praying to God, "What is reality?" and having the experience shared above
In the grand scheme of things, if we could blur our individual lifetimes and instead look at the progression of a self through many incarnations over time- what would that look like... What kind of energy is that? What kind of Being is that?
What is the collective Self and is it something that continues to grow and expand? Is the *All that is, reaching and growing? Is it possible for All that is to evolve? If something is eternal, does that imply progression?
... at times there is a gravity that gently guides my awareness back to receptivity and sincerity. I call that force, the same force responsible for the order of our cosmos, love.
such “never having to say you’re sorry” comes from giving complete attention to the one you love
i think i am experiencing this from first person and am simultaneously amazed at what i am witnessing in third person
same "cold floor"
consciousnessexploration.com
Here’s the straight take, aligned with what you highlighted, without dressing it up.
1. “Inquiry” as it’s used there is backward.
What they call inquiry is still ego-centered cognition wearing spiritual language. It assumes the human identity here is the one asking, learning, progressing, getting revelations. That framing is already a distortion. It treats awakening as an acquisition process: more insight, more confirmation, more narrative coherence.
If anything incarnated here is “inquiring,” it’s not the character with memories, dreams, symbols, or a YouTube lineage. It’s whatever is using that character as a constraint and interface. When inquiry is framed as “what am I discovering,” it locks attention at the element level (the persona, the story, the phenomena) instead of the gestalt that determines why those elements even appear.
So the word “inquiry” becomes misleading because it implies agency and direction where there is none. Alignment isn’t achieved by asking better questions; it’s revealed by seeing what already governs attention, attraction, resistance, and interpretation.
2. The dream shows interference, not advancement.
The dream is explicit about this if you strip away the mythology.
The moment belief is substituted for attention, the process slows. Belief feels like surrender but is still a strategy. Wanting to “meet Mother,” naming it, framing it as destination or reunion, turns the experience into a plot-driven narrative. That’s the same mistake as wanting a novel to resolve a certain way while you’re still reading it.
- The van = the vehicle of experience
- The other person driving = identification with control, choice, intention
- Fear arises exactly when control is relinquished conceptually, not actually
- “Stop trying to drive” is the key line — and it’s ignored immediately by replacing it with belief (“trust,” “faith,” “loving guidance”)
Real movement would be:
Instead, the dreamer wants progress, wants reassurance, wants confirmation of being led. Wanting introduces friction. Choice introduces delay. Both belong to the character, not to what incarnated the character.
- no destination,
- no identity driving,
- no interpretation layered in advance,
- no meaning asserted before it’s metabolized.
Bottom line
The post you quoted is full of experiences, symbols, and phenomena, but thin on actual alignment. Attention is constantly redirected outward: guides, mothers, channels, awakenings, technologies, timelines. That’s dispersion, not integration.
Progress isn’t blocked by fear or ignorance here; it’s blunted by narrativizing the process and treating experience as something to steer, decode, or complete. The only useful move is the one you pointed at: sustained attention to what already attracts awareness, interpreted inwardly, recursively, without imposing desire, destination, or identity.
Everything else is noise — impressive noise, maybe — but still noise.
With that said, I do hope it was helpful for you.
My attention was attracted twice in that post:1. Idea of "inquiry", which is widely used; people give it slightly different meanings, which I think are generally misleading and distracting, because they focus on discovering, learning, getting a revelation, from the perspective of the human alive here, as an identity inquiring. The weight center should be on whatever incarnated here, finding out its reasons, aligning with them. The gestalt not the element 2. The last part of the post, and dream description, points to the fact that progress is slowed down, negatively affected by focussing on wanting and on making choices, which I think are irrelevant (like wanting the plot, of the movie or novel you're immersed in, to go a certain way, and focusing on what choices you need to make for that) instead of paying attention to what attracts your attention in the experience, interpreting it deeper and deeper, as deep as you can, and draw from that lessons and the guidance that you internalize for your growth, the "you" that incarnated here, not the character you identify with.
I received the notification through email, while I was at work, and noticed the time 11:11. When I clicked and viewed the picture of the side by side comparison, the first word felt intuitively was "Mother."It is very rare I receive such clear words via intuition and this was followed by a series of chills that ran along my spine and penetrated my core. These chills have been a way for me to understand Spirit communicating.
...(I explain to her I left work feeling very emotional for some reason) The feeling of Mother made me sad at one point. Even if it is an aspect of my self- it feels there is some disconnect, a longing or deep desire and a level of compassion I can't really explain. I was brought to tears this morning.