• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

Just something to share

jaguar

jaguar

Senior Registered
I would like to share something with you.
I have not been to this forum for a long time.
You kindly send me a note wishing me a happy birthday.
I visited the site to see what was going on.
Somehow it is different. It seems lighter to me. Perhaps I have changed.
Since I last visited my life has taken twists and turns.
I have continued studying the physics of the universe and how it relates to reincarnation.
During my last visits to this site I had read that the supporters of the site believed that we are beings of light. I did not like to hear that and opposed the idea. However, my recent scientific studies reveal that it is true. I am coming at this from a hard science point of view. I can demonstrate this mathematically. I am talking Special Relativity and Quantum Physics here. I apologize to anyone I may have attempted to force my opinion on. I have spent over a year of my life putting these ideas into book form.
It is almost finished.
I am learning to ask and listen. It is difficult.
At a recent point in time I was working for a company that graded high school tests.
I worked in a room with hundreds of terminals. On an occasion an Indian sat next to me wearing a turban and long beard. On the other side of me a mature attractive woman sat. Being interested in reincarnation I asked the Indian about it. Yes, he believed in reincarnation but I was not to study it for it was forbidden. Instead, I was to follow him, not cut my hair, eat the right foods and become a spirit of nothing. In short, he decided he was my guru. Several polite conversations were required to back out of that. The lady, on the other hand, heard me talking with the Indian. The next day she brought in a book about Jesus Christ that I must absolutely read.
Well, I asked and attempted to just listen. It can be difficult.
What of that I wish to share?
I am getting older. My heart is beginning to fail. Not to worry. It is part of life and if you believe what I believe; I already live forever.
But as I ponder the end, I find myself thinking the thought, “I can leave my crimes behind.” Then I realized that I was committing a grave error. (I must point out one of my beliefs to explain the insight that follows. I have reviewed hundreds and hundreds of my past lives. I have not seen what many claim to be spiritual teachings. For example, I have not seen this thing called karma. My memories precede the Big Bang and I am at a loss to see where karma came from.) To get to my point. One of my desires is to carry a stronger consciousness from life to life. I realized that if I expected a death to erase my past sins, I would be incapable of carrying consciousness forward. In other words, if I cannot be responsible for what I do or have done now, I will not gain ability I desire. I believe this has nothing to do with the spirit community. It has everything to do with what I think about myself. The thing is that it is not a matter of going back and apologizing to anyone, or going back making things right or suffering in the future for past errors. It is a matter of being willing to not do it again. That is, being willing to be responsible in the future and the right now. Right now, this feels the absolutely right thing to do.

There is another aspect to this. I have practiced karate a great deal in my life. My master instructor has competed in many tournaments. He has won many and lost many. He has told me that when he faces an opponent in the ring, he feels he is fighting himself. I understand what this means. It all seems to come together.

Well, that is it. I don’t think I have explained it well. I guess I needed to tell these things to someone.

Jaguar
 
Hi jaguar,


Just wiped my previous comment. Thinking about it after going to bed, I felt it may be taken to be a little insensitive.


I meant only to convey that we are all of us in pretty much the same boat when it comes to seeking out the answers to how the universe works.


I hope you find what you're looking for jaguar, there are plenty of folks here who are ready to help.


Regards


Merlin
 
jaguar said:
Well, that is it. I don’t think I have explained it well. I guess I needed to tell these things to someone.
Click to expand...
Hi Jaguar!


It was a thrill to read the insights of someone, who has joined the Forum so long ago, and who has gone through the changes of viewpoint that you've just described. And you have described those realizations very well.


Thank you very much for coming back!
 
Question for Merlin


Merlin, what caused the Big Bang?


My largest desire is to find people that have traveled way back.


I want to know if they have seen the things I have seen.


Is there anyone else that has seen the events that led up to the Big Bang?


Jaguar
 
Hi jaguar,


I've only just noticed your post asking me about the 'big bang'.


I check into the site daily and have no idea why I haven't seen this before. I apologise for the delay in answering.


I have not travelled back myself, but over a lifetime of research I have formulated my own theory of how the universe formed. It includes the 'big bang' and what came before.


I cannot post it here, because it involves concepts which are not in harmony with the guidelines of this board.


I can however, send you a PM, which I will do as soon as I finish this post.


Feel free to reply on the board or by PM any time.


Regards


Merlin
 
About your theory, kind of.


Sorry, right now I am extremely busy trying to finish a book by the end of the month.


I scanned your theory.


Also, if what I say here is out of line with the forum, please tell me where I can read about it. In a month will be more serious.


In a day or so I will read your material carefully. It seems somewhat standard in our day of religious understanding.


Right now I am so excited to talk to someone about this stuff, I cannot resist.


I agree the physical world came from the spirit universe. What was the mechanics? Just to say that matter merged out of the spirit is not enough for me. What was the mechanics?


Also, I remember a spirit war before the Big Bang occurred. I have reviewed a few religions and they have somewhat mythical interpretations of this event. Christianity has one. Hindu religion has another. Even Scientology has one. The result of that war was the creation of the physical universe.


I desire hard logic about what this is all about.


By the way, I am rather expert on the relation between mass, energy, space and time. I can derive all formulas of Special Relativity, Kinetic Energy, Potential Energy, and E=mc^2. This math emerges from a fundamental understanding of the link between the spiritual and the physical. The real secret is that the universe is of light.


I am very glad to have a chance to review your thoughts.


By the way, do you do magic? You may know me. I created the Matrix.


Jaguar
 
Hello Jaguar,


I am sure that anything you post here that is not in accord with the guidelines of this board will be edited by the guardians in the best interests of the forum. A couple of them have rapped me on the knuckles for my posts, but they mean well and I have taken their criticism to heart more as guidance than as condemnation. If you inadvertently step over the line, they will let you know, in the nicest possible way, but by all means feel free to express yourself.


I will wait until you finish your book before expecting an answer. But I disagree that this is standard religious fare. I do not believe that science can answer all the questions that are based in the metaphysical lore. Physics, as a science, cannot touch upon the metaphysical, which by definition, is 'beyond physics'.


Science, for instance, believes that everything came from an infinitesimally small 'nothing', (the big bang), and they have not yet progressed in knowledge beyond that point. I have never been comfortable with that view. There must have been something beforehand which caused that expansion, and a precipitate universe could explain that to some extent. You seem to be a person qualified to either confirm or deny that hypothesis.


If you agree that the physical universe came from the spiritual, then the material which I am sending you may help you to understand my point of view. The mechanics are the natural laws of the universe which science is only just beginning to understand.


Various religions have their own creation theories, but as I said, the material I am sending you by e-mail speaks for itself. The 'wars in heaven' are personified versions of astronomical events contrived by man to fit his ideas of creation.


Hard logic is something which I am personally in disfavour of. As I said before, science and 'hard logic' can lead to 'logical' conclusions which are absolutely absurd in the light of history and reality. Science must combine the spiritual origins of man with hard science to be able to grasp the whole picture. Without that, they only have half the picture.


I am puzzled by your formula 'E=Mc^2'. I take it to mean that E-Energy, M=the mass of the earth, c=the speed of light, and ^=equal to, 2=squared. Is that different to E=Mc2.


There is an account of Einstein's reincarnation, who's present life name escapes me for the moment, but when he was in the spiritual, he was channelled and was recorded as amending his formula to E=Mc3. (that is, cubed.) Which is a whole new level of energy, but takes into account the energy which is available in the spiritual realm.


You are correct in saying the universe is of light, for in light, all things are contained. But that's a whole different discussion.


My name of 'Merlin' is a non-de-plume only. And apart from a life in Atlantis as a black magician, (where I greatly misused my powers) and a few years in this life of studying magic, I no longer pursue this interest, and although the effects of 'magic' can be very real, I found it to be a cul-de-sac in the endeavours of the mind.


You speak of the Matrix. Do you mean 'The Matrix of the Mind'? If so, I applaud your achievements. Let me know.


Regards


Merlin


P.s.


I have just learned that you do not wish to receive e-mails. If you wish to view the rest of my writings, please feel free to contact me by PM.
 
I'd be extremely surprised if it didn't.


You'd be talking to a bunch of people on the other side who are a whole lot smarter than me though.


Regards


Merlin
 
Jaguar,


you seem determined to nail me down to a yes or no answer, so...


I would have to say yes, logic does have sway in the spiritual planes, but that is only my own opinion. Whether it 'prevails', to use your own word, is a matter for conjecture.


I also believe that the spirit guides would use it to cajole/convince souls into reincarnating in order to resolve their karma. They can be pretty convincing. And their brand of logic may be different to your own. Be careful what you wish for.


I used to think they lay awake at night dreaming up all sorts of schemes to get us to complete our earth experiences, like: "how can we get this guy to do so-and-so", etc....


Regards


Merlin
 
Jaguar,


I would have to say no. Again, this is only my opinion.


At spirit level, communication is by mind. All is open, so a lie would immediately be detected.


Where are you going with this?


Merlin
 
I am attempting to make two points.


The point of this is to respond to some comments you have made. There are two that I find very disturbing. One: Science is not aware of the spiritual realm. Two: Someone channeled to Einstein and found it is E=mc3 not mc2.


E is Energy


m is mass


c is speed of light


3 & 2 is power of c


I will address the first. Physics was developed by deeply religious people. Most initial work was done by priests and was done for the glory of god. Isaac Newton was deeply religious and was an alchemist. He believed that the forces of nature were dependent on spiritual emanations. His work expressed this mathematically. He was blasted by his contemporaries for trying to force, “Demons” on the world. You see, the man that created physics did so from a spiritual perspective.


A powerful tool science uses in its technology is called Occum’s Razor. Occum was a devout monk. In his time he observed that god was used as an explanation for many physical events. He developed a method of observing the world he called a razor. Its purpose was to cut away needless thought and view the heart of some issue. You will hear many known scientists quote Occum’s words as they describe their work.


Max Planck, the guy that happened to create quantum mechanics, was a deeply religious person. He did not accept his own work and spent much of his life trying to correct what he thought was an error in his thinking.


You people use science when it serves you and blast it when it contradicts your fanciful ideas.


Let me address the second item about channeling Einstein. I asked if you believe the spiritual universe was logical. If the spiritual universe has no logic and created this universe, would this universe be logical? Well, you hesitated to say the spiritual universe is logical. Your credibility is beginning to fail, logically.


The next test is to see if you believe the spiritual universe can lie. You do not believe they can. Do you have any idea how big the spiritual universe is? Do you have an idea how big this universe is? I strongly recommend getting on You Tube and searching on the size of stars. It is mind boggling. The point is that the spiritual universe created this universe. For all practical purposes this universe is infinite. How big is the universe that created it? You say that in all that immense stuff, no one lies. The point is that any voice, of an infinite number, from the other side can whisper in your ear and you will take it to be the truth.


What kind of a logical conclusion can I draw from this?


By the way, we are spiritual beings. Do we lie?


Jaguar
 
Hmm.


One thing at a time:


“One: Science is not aware of the spiritual realm.”


What I said was: “I do not believe that science can answer all the questions that are based in the metaphysical lore. Physics, as a science, cannot touch upon the metaphysical, which by definition, is 'beyond physics'.”


Science is obviously aware of the spiritual realm, they're just having trouble getting a handle on it. Their first mistake is to dismiss the whole concept out of hand as nonsense.


I've been trying to find the reference about Einstein, but I read it so long ago that I have no idea where to start looking. Suffice to say I was just repeating something I read as a point of interest.


I have no issue with people who are deeply religious, as well as being scientists. In fact, I applaud the combination. If more scientists began getting religion, they may stop dismissing the spiritual aspect of man as nonsense and we might start getting somewhere. At least they would have both sides of the argument to play with.


You've also got to keep in mind that 'deeply religious people' also gave us the 'Flat Earth' theory, the Inquisition, the Crusades and the Dark Ages.


I am familiar with the concept of 'Occam's Razor'.


I'm not about to get into an in depth discussion with you about Planck and Einstein. I'm nobody's idea of a scientist.


Einstein commented on Planck's work, and stated:


"Moreover, it (Planck's work) has shattered the whole framework of classical mechanics and electrodynamics and set science a fresh task: that of finding a new conceptual basis for all physics. Despite remarkable partial gains, the problem is still far from a satisfactory solution."


(Albert Einstein, on Quantum Theory, 1950)


Even 60 years or so down the track, science is still searching for this 'New Conceptual Basis for all physics.' They'll find it (imho) when they stop dismissing the spiritual laws of the universe as mumbo-jumbo.


“If the spiritual universe has no logic and created this universe, would this universe be logical? Well, you hesitated to say the spiritual universe is logical.”


I did not deny that the universe is logical. I said I was in disfavour of hard logic. I had a friend who's delight in life was to engage me in 'logical' discussions whereby I found myself agreeing with his statements until the end result clearly was a load of rubbish, but had been arrived at by completely valid 'logic'.


The universe imo would have to be completely logical, but it is only when all the rules which hold it together are understood that we would be able to see the truth in this.


As for my credibility, it has taken a few beatings over the years, but I manage to nurse it along to my own satisfaction.


My idea of how big the universe is, is pretty much the same as the next man's. I have an excellent selection of publications on the subject, own a reasonable telescope, and have built a small planetarium. I have a yearning to be 'out there'.


“The point is that the spiritual universe created this universe.” We can agree wholeheartedly on this point.


As to lying. It is obvious that lies are a fact. But I contend that they are confined to the physical realm and can have no sway in the purely spiritual.


“The point is that any voice, of an infinite number, from the other side can whisper in your ear and you will take it to be the truth.”


Physical human beings lie. Astral beings have been found to lie, being little more than deceased human beings. Beyond that point are many other levels of existence. Where the lying stops I have no idea. And what I take to be truth is usually based on backup from other sources and my own experience. Each person constructs their own philosophy.


Regards


Merlin.
 
Jaguar,


No problem.


What else you wanna talk about?


I'd still like to send you that other stuff I mentioned so we can have a common data base to discuss, but like I said before, I can wait until you finish your book.


Regards


Merlin
 
Merlin said:
The universe imo would have to be completely logical, but it is only when all the rules which hold it together are understood that we would be able to see the truth in this.
Click to expand...
This was going to be my sole contribution to the discussion...but you beat me to it, Merlin.


And while I can understand the driving need to understand how everything fits together, I have an underlying theory based in a warm resonance that I need but wait for my next transition to become completely knowledgeable of the entire process...and my time here and now is to learn to look for the bird singing in the tree outside my office window, and to ensure daily that I feel the depth of the love I have for that little boy in the picture to the left.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top