SeaAndSky
Senior Registered
Most of the conversation so far on this thread (as usual) seems to focus on gender as it is expressed in the physical, and why it is tied--as sex--to the physical and is therefore merely an artifact of physicality with no ultimate existence outside of this realm. An unmentioned subtext (and perhaps I exaggerate in the way I express this) seems to be that any insistence on gender as representing something basic in the nature of the universe is at best an expression of the fevered and "earthly" hang-ups of the less evolved.
However, another approach lies in recognizing the basic yin/yang, male/female, positive/negative, north pole/south pole, dark/light, etc. duality of phenomena. This principle appears to be a universal in the physical, and I do not think it is ludicrous to posit its extension into non-physical realms. How far it extends towards the absolute I do not know, but I do not think that it is absurd to consider the possibility that a concept as fluid as "gender" has different expressions at different levels and on different planes of existence.
Of course, we might not recognize it on some of these levels as "gender" anymore. It may transcend the limitations imposed by the concept of "gender" just as "gender" transcends the limitations imposed by the concept of physical sexual differences--however, this would not mean that it did not exist in some even broader form. Perhaps it has to do with a basic division in the way reality is approached and dealt with. I do not know, but I do know that discussing the issue as being somehow tantamount to physical sexuality carried out of the physical is merely a straw man argument and does not really engage the issue.
Cordially,
S&S
However, another approach lies in recognizing the basic yin/yang, male/female, positive/negative, north pole/south pole, dark/light, etc. duality of phenomena. This principle appears to be a universal in the physical, and I do not think it is ludicrous to posit its extension into non-physical realms. How far it extends towards the absolute I do not know, but I do not think that it is absurd to consider the possibility that a concept as fluid as "gender" has different expressions at different levels and on different planes of existence.
Of course, we might not recognize it on some of these levels as "gender" anymore. It may transcend the limitations imposed by the concept of "gender" just as "gender" transcends the limitations imposed by the concept of physical sexual differences--however, this would not mean that it did not exist in some even broader form. Perhaps it has to do with a basic division in the way reality is approached and dealt with. I do not know, but I do know that discussing the issue as being somehow tantamount to physical sexuality carried out of the physical is merely a straw man argument and does not really engage the issue.
Cordially,
S&S