At least not CONSCIOUSLY.tanguerra said:He doesn't know anything about this forum or anything and I wouldn't dream of telling him. I'm so glad we're friends again.
Hi BriarRose.BriarRose said:I'm very sorry about your dog, Tanguerra. They really can leave a monstrous, great, empty hole in a person's life when they die. It was interesting that "X" was wearing his "name-sake" shirt. Has his personality been consistently like Sheldon's over the centuries? You are in a unique position to observe to what degree personality changes from life to life. That program is one of the few on TV that I like, but conducting a relationship with Sheldon would have many challenges.
Thanks Chris. I had a little 'flash' of him bounding about on green grass happily, healthy and full of fun once more, just after he died. I'm sure he's up in puppy dog heaven having a wonderful time. I'm sure we'll meet again.ChrisR said:Sorry to hear about your dog. At least there's some compensation in the fact that he lived a good long life and didn't die prematurely. I hope you get to meet him again some day hug2.gif
Thanks Tinkerman. I really couldn't say how long the 'embrace' lasted. Time stood still. Everything seemed to 'stop' until I felt better. It was lovely that's for sure.Tinkerman said:...That embrace? Well... they last forever!
Blessing my friend.
Tman
Mama2HRB said:I am very sorry for the loss of your furrbaby. They truly become like our children, mine thinks she is the third daughter ...
Probably 'just a coincidence'?argonne1918 said:At least not CONSCIOUSLY.
It is described in the thread, but it's very long, so you could easily have missed it. We were 'together' every day, inseparable, for about 5 or 6 (rather wonderful) months, then he suddenly left me and I didn't see him for about 7 years. It was a very bitter time. He would not give me an explanation. The best I got is he told one of his friends it 'didn't work out'.BriarRose said:I read this thread over, in it's entirety, and was struck by a question. Has this relationship ever been romantic in this lifetime? I understand relationships with the opposite sex that are platonic, yet involve unexplained yearning. If it has never been romantic, do you have any theories as to what blockage might exist that keeps it from happening? Is there, for instance, a substantial difference in age? That isn't something that I would infer from your posts. There is obviously a meeting of the mind, and intellect. You share a sense of humour, and have an intricate and rich past together. I am in the process of reading a book about pre-life planning by Robert Schwartz. How do you feel about this subject, and is that what's involved in your not being a "couple"?
I'm not big on the whole 'pre-planning' theory as I've said more than once. Perhaps it works for some people. It all sounds a bit too plodding and bureaucratic to me and doesn't gel with how I see the universe working, which is a far more chaotic and fluid sort of affair. Different people probably have different experiences. I don't know....It sounds as if you planned to meet, and be in each other's lives, but made a "soul agreement" to remain platonic. It sometimes seems as if I have about as much emotional intelligence as Sheldon Cooper, and I am sorry for the barrage of questions! I would like to understand whether pre-life planning has any validity. I suspect that it does, but your story might shed some light on it.
Maybe we're just two naughty sprites playing around to amuse ourselves and relieve the boredom of eternity? I don't begin to know for sure. I know that in this life I wished and wished and wished for him, then one day, when I thought I couldn't bear it any more (and he was in the middle of the biggest crisis of his life) blam! there he was and nothing was ever the same again.I had a sort of lucid dream/meditation once where X and I were in a spirit state, up in 'heaven' and were having an argument, something we never, ever do in real life and never have even at our worst moments [we hadn't until that time at least]. Anyway, in the 'vision' we were sitting around somewhat bored, up in 'heaven' [he was 'silver' and I was 'gold' - it made perfect sense at the time] and we could not agree which was the worst kind of separation from a loved one: for someone you love to die, if so, to die of an illness or accident, to die if it was your fault, if it wasn't your fault, to disappear and never know what happened to them, or to be in love with someone who did not love you...
I wouldn't say that exactly. Certainly he has been a profound influence on me time and time again (not just this life) as no doubt I have been on him. The world would be a very dull and empty place to me without him in it.Is it possible that your feelings about "X" have made you who you are as a person?
We don't talk about all that. There are much more interesting things to discuss! Even if he knows or remembers why, he is usually very reticent about discussing things like that. Besides I'm pretty sure it's the reason I describe above.BriarRose said:Thank you for the reply. I'm glad you had a few months together. Has he been able to articulate why he left? On some level, your soul must know what the real reason is...
Thank you BriarRose. It's mysterious to me too - or should I say, it's 'mysterious' (intriguing) on some levels but not on others. X amuses me and fills me with delight and I like to think it's mutual. I can't imagine life without him in it. It would be (almost) insupportably dull.BriarRose said:Your posts are often wise, Tanguerra, and always a revelation to me. Please forgive if I was too blunt. You and X are mysterious in a way that none of my relationships have ever been.
This thread 'My friend X' is as close as I think I'll ever get to writing out 'our story' in full and I think it stands on its own merits as a testament to true love, eternity, soul mates and all that jazz. Happy 'fantasy' endings are for nursery rhymes. Life is a journey. Things happen. You deal with it. That's what makes it fun and interesting (in my view).Did you write about it in your book? Would you ever want to write the story as it happened, and give it a fantasy ending? I suppose the point is that it never ends, and that is for you, the beauty of the thing.
The highest ideal form of romantic love is true love. The sublime, spiritual feeling of true love does not require any type of possession of the other. True love is serene, eternal and unchanging. True love wants only what is best for the other. True love has no fear of being deserted. True love is outward shining like the sun and does not require reflection as the moon does in order to glow.
Unconditional love - whether for a lover, a friend or a child - exists in the real world in spite of life's ups and downs, bad behaviour, bad moods, bad luck and bad hair days. In its gentle embrace all are nurtured, attended to and encouraged. Unconditional love is not withdrawn in order to punish or taken away when the money runs out. Unconditional love is not bestowed as a reward for good behaviour or traded for sex. It just is - night and day, rain or shine.
We'll see how we go. There's nothing for a potential 'beau' to be jealous about in my friendship with X (there is a zero per cent chance of us ever 'hooking up' again this life, short of some kind of miracle for instance). By the same token anyone who couldn't handle it would just have to say 'bye bye' because I wouldn't have any time for someone who felt threatened by my friendships with anyone at all, especially X. X does grow on people after a while, once they get past his outward eccentricities. He really is very sweet natured and quite charming when he's being good...BriarRose said:... I hope your new beau works out. It seems that it would be very hard for a real, flesh and blood man to compete with your concept of your relationship with X. Most of the men I know would be too insecure to handle it.
What she really means is she doesn't like us "old people" using their slang.BriarRose said:My daughter admonishes me not to use phrases like that - they don't fit my "age, and dignity". :laugh:
There are lots of ways for love to 'work out'. A long and happy marriage is one of them, but there are others. I quite like the idea of X and me being friends until we're very very old (if we ever get very very old). I quite like the idea of us alternately gossiping, bickering and laughing boisterously on some verandah somewhere, with rugs over over knees. Who knows? Time will tell.BriarRose said:... I am not a very romantic person - my husband is more so. But, I still think of us as "Romeo and Juliette". I'm sure the rest of the world doesn't see us that way, just two late middle-aged people holding hands. When we are alone, we are young again, and perfectly beautiful, and always in love. The years, and the "bumps and bruises' go away. I guess my definition of "storybook" is different than yours. It's the quiet contentment of being together into old age, with the one you love, and little drama. Love can be "imperishable", and still work out. I am told that not many people have that. I hope I never find out!
No you have it right.BriarRose said:I was on You-Tube all afternoon yesterday, listening to "old music". I have always like the song "Diamonds and Rust", by Joan Baez. I actually thought about you and X, although perhaps I still have it wrong!
...Love never goes out of style. We have always loved soppy love stories with happy endings, we lap up the tragic tales of starcrossed lovers like thirsty kittens and we have done so for thousands of years. It’s not just women either. Men do it too. Long before the invention of the ‘chick flick’ Shakespeare wrote Romeo and Juliet. Tolstoy wrote Anna Karenina. D.H. Lawrence wrote Lady Chatterly’s Lover. Hogey Charmichael wrote Star Dust.. men all of them...
It's like that. Hard to explain.. It just is what it is..... [Once upon a time a beautiful lady married a king, but there was a catch. Her brothers were under a spell]...The poor girl thought, "I can no longer stay here. I will go and seek my brothers." And when night came, she ran away, and went straight into the forest. She walked the whole night long, and next day also without stopping, until she could go no farther for weariness. Then she saw a forest-hut, and went into it, and found a room with six little beds, but she did not venture to get into one of them, but crept under one, and lay down on the hard ground, intending to pass the night there. Just before sunset, however, she heard a rustling, and saw six swans come flying in at the window. They alighted on the ground and blew at each other, and blew all the feathers off, and their swan's skins stripped off like a shirt. Then the maiden looked at them and recognized her brothers, was glad and crept forth from beneath the bed. The brothers were not less delighted to see their little sister, but their joy was of short duration. "Here canst thou not abide," they said to her. "This is a shelter for robbers, if they come home and find thee, they will kill thee." "But can you not protect me?" asked the little sister. "No," they replied, "only for one quarter of an hour each evening can we lay aside our swan's skins and have during that time our human form; after that, we are once more turned into swans." The little sister wept and said, "Can you not be set free?" "Alas, no," they answered, "the conditions are too hard! For six years thou mayst neither speak nor laugh, and in that time thou must sew together six little shirts of starwort [stinging nettles] for us. And if one single word falls from thy lips, all thy work will be lost." And when the brothers had said this, the quarter of an hour was over, and they flew out of the window again as swans...