• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

Xenoglossy in the news

Very interesting article.


Since all time is simultaneous, perhaps she was living a German past life while in her coma. I wonder if anyone will look at the possibility of reincarnation as to why she could not speak German well before her coma, but will speak nothing else now.
 
Since all time is simultaneous...
Click to expand...
Hi Susie,


Sorry if I have to agree to disagree again, but in all reality how can this be??? Something that might trigger a past life consciousness into a present one IMO is not the same as a "simultaneousness". To believe in this would also imply in believing that "future lives" are also happening simultaneously, which would completely rule out any chance of the action of "free will" in the "here and now".


IMO our Soul/Consciousness is not permanently expanded throughout our various incarnations simultaneously, but constantly creating "in the now" by the choices of one's free will. Again IMO there is no "Higher Self" that would be external to us. Our "Higher Self" is who, in essence, we "truly are" as the Soul/Consciousness that we are NOW, albeit temporarily hampered by the "Physical Consciuousness Cap" of each incarnation/lifetime. I keep wondering where this concept of "living all our lives simultaneously" comes from, and how such a concept could fit into other concepts such as "free will" and "karma"... :confused:


I am certainly not questioning you personally, and by all means let's just agree to disagree; I know that many others here also hold this concept as true, but I am curious as to just how this concept came to be...
 
Charles,


When you have a past life experience, it is in the now, not "back then." Perhaps this person was experiencing, or remembering, if you will, this past life while in the coma.


Yes, we will have to agree to disagree. ;)
 
Hi Susie,


I was discussing this issue also with other members and moderators, in particular the experience of accessing the "Akashic Records", which do indeed seem "real" and "happening in the now", but as far as I know are far more an access ro records than an actual reality occurring "now". Even in the Hollographic theory, there is still nevertheless the unfolding/enfolding process...


A concept of "simultaneous time" would also necessarily have to include future lives, which again would mean that there is no room for free will or even karma. It would also imply in a "beginning" and an "end", which again goes against the concept of eternity or infinity. "Heaven" is not a final goal to be reached, but a state of Spirit and an environment very different to this world of trials and tribulations. The universe, and "life", are infinite and eternal, and the opportunities for learning and growth are as infinite as the universe itself.


Now it is you who have not answered my question: how would free will and karma fit into a process by which, if all things are happening simultaneously, would also imply in all things being "set in stone"?
 
In the spirit of friendly debate, this is something that I have been thinking about for some time and I am open to others viewpoints - so these are just some thoughts I have been entertaining.

Charles Stuart said:
Something that might trigger a past life consciousness into a present one IMO is not the same as a "simultaneousness".
Click to expand...
I think it is just that we lack the terminology among ourselves to adequately describe what we are talking about. The "past life consciousness" of the young woman, who Jody has brought to our attention, could have been described as her concurrent life consciousness or her simultaneous incarnation. Perhaps, in time, the concepts of "all time being simultaneous" will bring forth new terminology that will more adequately describe new discoveries and new thoughts in physics that indicate that the past and future are collaborating to engender the now.

Charles Stuart said:
To believe in this would also imply in believing that "future lives" are also happening simultaneously, which would completely rule out any chance of the action of "free will" in the "here and now".
Click to expand...
I disagree that free will in the now would be ruled out. I do believe that free will is inviolate and see no ambiguity in that sense. It is a hard concept to grasp and I do not claim to have a firm understanding of it myself. I do believe that reality does take into account all probabilities and therein may account for free will. All possible probabilities, an infinite number of incarnations in an infinite number of universes may be the reality and all in the same now - and how can simple folk that we are, in this incarnation, hope to understand that! :freak:

Charles Stuart said:
IMO our Soul/Consciousness is not permanently expanded throughout our various incarnations simultaneously, but constantly creating "in the now" by the choices of one's free will. Again IMO there is no "Higher Self" that would be external to us. Our "Higher Self" is who, in essence, we "truly are" as the Soul/Consciousness that we are NOW, albeit temporarily hampered by the "Physical Consciousness Cap" of each incarnation/lifetime. I keep wondering where this concept of "living all our lives simultaneously" comes from, and how such a concept could fit into other concepts such as "free will" and "karma"...
Click to expand...
Our higher self is not external to us but is the same thing. We are just much more complex than we can grasp. We are experiencing all of our incarnations at the same time because there is only the now.


Some of my "memories" were of a nature that have convinced me that I was actually there in that body, at that time period and experiencing life as that individual in the now. So I have come to believe that we are experiencing all incarnation simultaneously because there is only now. That is my belief at this time (or at this now - I am not sure how to phrase that :laugh:).


The science also has been a great influence on me in this respect. The science and my personal experience have led down this path - for good or ill, I know not.
 
Hi Stardis,


Yes, certainly in the spirit of a friendly debate, for our own benefit and that of others, and most definitely not upon a personal prisma. I myself have to respect what others have experienced and attempt to "wrap my mind around the concept", but I must admit that it is a VERY tough one for me, even more so as I myself have never experienced anything similar to what others appear to have done here. :thumbsup:


To the best of my own knowledge, however, there is not an infinite number of dimensions and/or lifetimes occurring cuncurrently, but one Higher Self/True Self/Conscious Soul "experiencing" as it "creates" through "time". Were everything simultaneous, or if we could be living all our lives simultaneously, to me this gives an impression that there would be no room even for Consciousness to "create", whereas the concept of the Soul/Consciousness constantly creating "in the now" via the decisions of our free will would...


In Spiritism it is said that there are nine "dimensions", not an infinite multitude of them. Likewise I personally cannot envisage "simultanous lives" rather than the Soul/Consciousness effectively acting upon the creation of our realities at every "instant" or "now".


Upon death, the Soul/Consciousness maintains its momentum and will even maintain its spiritual body in the same shape and format as while incarnate. There is not a "there and here", just as there is not a "then and now". It is never (or at least almost never) in two locations "at the same time". It is a question of "either/or". Certainly it is capable of "bi-location", but apparently not for very long periods of time (such as an entire lifetime, for example).


I realize that the experience of accessing the Akashic Records does indeed seem very real and "in the now", for it is not only "images in light" but also all the thoughts and sensations that go with it, and I do believe that our Consciousness does access it as such, as a real experience, not a "memory". It is said that after we "pass over", this instrument is used as a means of better evaluating all the experiences of each incarnation/lifetime. We access such records as a means of revising and better understanding the results and consequences of all our choices. But personally I find it very difficult to grasp a concept by which we, as Soul/Consciousnesses, would be "there" and "here" at the same time...
 
Charles Stuart said:
I realize that the experience of accessing the Akashic Records does indeed seem very real and "in the now", for it is not only "images in light" but also all the thoughts and sensations that go with it, and I do believe that our Consciousness does access it as such, as a real experience, not a "memory". It is said that after we "pass over", this instrument is used as a means of better evaluating all the experiences of each incarnation/lifetime. We access such records as a means of revising and better understanding the results and consequences of all our choices. But personally I find it very difficult to grasp a concept by which we, as Soul/Consciousnesses, would be "there" and "here" at the same time...
Click to expand...
My friend, I agree with you on the Akashic Records. If they are what we believe them to be, then I do see how accessing them could be experienced as real and "now". I do wonder about that. I, as you know, think of the Records as a Stream of Consciousness and believe that its effects upon ones accessing that stream would be the same as accessing the Akashic Records. But, tell me why do you refer to it as an instrument. Is it a piece of technology or a natural function of Creation?


My reason for doubting that I have accessed the Akashic Records is that occasionally as a child, I would find myself "outside myself" observing my interactions with others - mainly family members. I remember that on one occasion I observed myself listening to a long lecture on how my behavior had caused my mother great embarrassment and that she couldn't see how she could go to church and hold her head up again. My higher self found her to be ridiculous and found the whole episode amusing - while standing near my human body who was standing in front of her with his head hanging down. There are other instances and unless I am just mentally ill, I find that these experiences support my belief that my self - I am going to say higher self because I have used that term for decades now - is experiencing this incarnation at the same time that I am experiencing others - one soul, many lives.
 
I would like to ask some questions. I'm not attacking anyone's beliefs, everyone has the right to believe what they will. I respect that. I'm simply curious, and want to learn. I've only begun to explore the various beliefs regarding reincarnation. I feel as if I'm drowning in an ocean of information here. I had no idea there was so much scientific and philosophical information on the subject! But there's one question buzzing around the forefront of my sorry excuse of a mind; how in the blue blazes can one soul be shared among many? Can someone explain this to me? I'm somewhat familiar with quantum physics and the concept of multiple universes, timelines, etc.,etc. I just have a hard time bending my mind( what's left of my mind ) around the idea of one soul shared by many people.
 
sellingmysoul said:
I feel as if I'm drowning in an ocean of information here. I had no idea there was so much scientific and philosophical information on the subject! But there's one question buzzing around the forefront of my sorry excuse of a mind; how in the blue blazes can one soul be shared among many? Can someone explain this to me? I'm somewhat familiar with quantum physics and the concept of multiple universes, timelines, etc.,etc. I just have a hard time bending my mind( what's left of my mind ) around the idea of one soul shared by many people.
Click to expand...
I have no empirical evidence to present as proof of any concept; it is just my thoughts about the nature of reality that I am sharing. I start off by postulating that we exist in a universe where all probabilities happen and the incarnation that we are experiencing is but one of an infinite number of incarnations.


It is not that one soul is shared by many people, rather it is one soul experiencing many incarnations simultaneously. It may seem at first like a difference in semantics, but it is more than that, it is the idea that time is an illusion for us. All consciousness is happening now - all experiences, all incarnations, everything exists in a timeless universe.


My incarnation 2000 years ago, 300 years ago and 100 years ago are all happening simultaneously and it just seems to me that they are happening in a linear time line because that is how we, as human beings, perceive reality. My higher self is experiencing all these incarnations in a timeless universe in a moment that is referred to as the now.
 
But stardis, the universe isn't timeless. Time isn't just an abstraction of the human mind. Time and space are inexorably intertwined. Entropy is a reality. Everything will, billions upon billions of years from now, wind down. The heat death of the universe is something that can't be avoided. It will happen. Relativity tells us this, and it's backed up by observational data. Scientists keep finding things to confirm relativity.
 
From all that I've read, the soul leaves the body, into the light, and experiences a self-judging review of the most recent lifetime. Then, the soul either leaps into another fetus, or stays awhile to do whatever they do there; teaching, taking care of animals, or just relaxing. After that period the soul enters the fetus, grows up (most of the time), makes mistakes within a period of time, then leaves the body at death, or near death. The self-judging process implies that the individual entity is reviewing it's mistakes for a reason, before moving onto the next step, doesn't it? Like some of the folks here, I have read that time isn't the same on the "other" side. I've also heard that there is NO time or space. However, I believe that the entire message may include the words, "as we know it", which implies that time DOES exist. Just not in the way that we are most familiar. Now, the only way that time can be different is that time passes more quickly, perhaps. Or, that knowledge doesn't obey the laws of time; and, perhaps, we can get glimpses of the past as well as the future. Who knows?


The fact is, I really don't know. Even if I had access to a medium, I couldn't tell you that I'm convinced by what the medium would be telling me. I have to admit, that I'm quite comfortable with the fact that 1 AM comes before 2 AM, and that each individual soul has to schlep from one lifetime to the next. I don't really know how, or even if we exist in a holographic paradigm, but it's fun to talk about.


I'm more concerned about whether I'm helping the world in some small way, or not. And, when I pass over, I'll be very happy with a little R&R before I chose my next family. My only hope is that I'll get to find out the answers to various mysteries, just to satisfy my earth-bound curiosity.


-Nightrain
 
Charles Stuart said:
Hi Susie...Now it is you who have not answered my question: how would free will and karma fit into a process by which, if all things are happening simultaneously, would also imply in all things being "set in stone"?
Click to expand...
Charles,


I'm not sure what you mean when you say simultaneous time would imply all things being set in stone. Can you please elaborate on this?


Free will and karma are always in place. Free will means I get to make my decisions at any given time. Karma is the consequence of my action. At any given time, even in a past life experience, I can chose to see things in a different light. I can choose to change my attitude in there here and now about anything that has happened or that is happening.
 
Allow me to rephrase that to read:



"My higher self is experiencing all these incarnations in a timeless

Consciousness

in a moment that is referred to as the now."



I understand what you are saying but, at this time, I do think that we are creating the illusion of time. I can't help but be a bit of a mystic because it seems that is who I am in this incarnation, so I can't imagine my existence as being apart from an Original Consciousness who I imagine sustains me with Its thoughts. In fact I would have to say that Consciousness is the universe and that our ideas and thoughts about the physical universe that we are aware of may be accurate and yet transient - in that the physical universe is whatever IT wants it to be. Now I have completely abandoned any scientifically consistent thought, haven't I?


I wonder what it is that will wind down: this dimension, maybe this universe? It is interesting to think about. Is the universe 9 dimensions as Charles Stuart says or is it 10 or 11 dimensions as physicists now think. What about another creation of the physical universe when the branes again collide - will we be marveling at creation all over again as perhaps we have done once before?
 
Hi all,


Sorry about the delay in replying, but am still without internet at home... :rolleyes:


Stardis, I can fully appreciate the difficulty in wrapping the experience around an understanding. It seems that the example you gave was an OBE, an out-of-body experience in which you could see yourself. You say you had your head down. Were you conscious or did you perhaps doze off? Deborah told of a similar experience in which she was OBE and could see her physical body sleeping and her ethereal body reading while she was in light-form. It seems that such can occur either by "bi-location" or by "expansion" of the consciousness, but both are usually temporary and of short duration. The point is, your Consciousness was OBE, but NOT simultaneously OBE AND IBE (have I created a new term for "in-the-body experience"? :D ) Terminology is a tough one for experiences that are new, aren't they? Perhaps I should have used the term "means" rather than "instrument" when I was referring to the accessing of the Akashic Records.

Is it a piece of technology or a natural function of Creation?
Click to expand...
A natural function of Creation, of course... :thumbsup:

There are other instances and unless I am just mentally ill, I find that these experiences support my belief that my self - I am going to say higher self because I have used that term for decades now - is experiencing this incarnation at the same time that I am experiencing others - one soul, many lives.
Click to expand...
Certainly you are not "mentally ill"... ;) It just seems that you, like Deborah, have a rather rare capacity of going OBE and accessing the Akashic Records. But when you say "one soul, many lives", of course I agree, but not that they are all simultaneous. To answer Susie's question, if all our incarnations were simultaneous, this would also necessarily imply that our "future lives" are already occurring also "in the now", which would make changes in destiny brought about by the application of our free-will impossible. I really cannot agree with this...


As Nightrain was saying, I am quite ok to understand that 1:00 am comes before 2:00 am, and not simultaneously. Just to use another analogy, we can discover Mayan ruins of 1000 years ago, but obviously we could never find ruins of New York 1000 years ago. Although "physical time" and "spiritual time" may be different, there is nevertheless always a "linearity" to them. According to Einstein (although certainly not the same laws of physics apply in the spiritual realms), Time = Space. If there were "no time", there would also have to be "no space".

So I can't imagine my existence as being apart from an Original Consciousness who I imagine sustains me with Its thoughts.
Click to expand...
I would tend to agree, but IMO the only Original Consciousness that would be capable of doing so would be the Universal Consciousness/God, and not our own. Ours, IMO, "sails through time", constantly creating at every "instant" or "now", eternal, indivisible and indestructible...
 
stardis, what winds down is energy. The heat death of the universe is that state when there is no more thermodynamic free energy to sustain motion, or life. Maximum entropy has been reached. Not even black holes can escape this. The black holes will eventually dissipate, evaporate. There would be energy, but that energy would be inaccessible. The universe will be cold, dark, and basically...dead, so to speak. No eternally expanding branes, no continued life on a "higher" plane, no anything. Just a cold, dark universe forevermore.
 
No eternally expanding branes, no continued life on a "higher" plane, no anything. Just a cold, dark universe forevermore.
Click to expand...
Hi Sellingmysoul (please don't... :laugh:)


Perhaps the physical realm might, but certainly not the spiritual... :thumbsup:
 
Hello Charles. I hope that you are safe and the rains and flooding have not caused you and your loved ones any grief or sorrow.

Charles Stuart said:
Stardis, I can fully appreciate the difficulty in wrapping the experience around an understanding. It seems that the example you gave was an OBE, an out-of-body experience in which you could see yourself. You say you had your head down. Were you conscious or did you perhaps doze off? Deborah told of a similar experience in which she was OBE and could see her physical body sleeping and her ethereal body reading while she was in light-form. It seems that such can occur either by "bi-location" or by "expansion" of the consciousness, but both are usually temporary and of short duration. The point is, your Consciousness was OBE, but NOT simultaneously OBE AND IBE (have I created a new term for "in-the-body experience"? :D ) Terminology is a tough one for experiences that are new, aren't they? Perhaps I should have used the term "means" rather than "instrument" when I was referring to the accessing of the Akashic Records.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the new term - IBE. Your creativity is most appreciated. Now you need to get to work on coming up with useful terms to express the concept of simultaneous incarnations and good luck with that!


You are correct in that my consciousness was not simultaneously in the small boy and OBE. I have never experienced awareness in this body and out of body at the same time. Interestingly, to me, is the fact that I have never felt any affection or attachment to this physical body during an OBE. When I was being lectured by my mother, the body was wide awake and when I found myself outside the body, I also found that my awareness had shifted to outside my body also.

Charles Stuart said:
A natural function of Creation, of course... :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
We are of one mind here - as I knew we would be.

Charles Stuart said:
Certainly you are not "mentally ill"... ;) It just seems that you, like Deborah, have a rather rare capacity of going OBE and accessing the Akashic Records. But when you say "one soul, many lives", of course I agree, but not that they are all simultaneous. To answer Susie's question, if all our incarnations were simultaneous, this would also necessarily imply that our "future lives" are already occurring also "in the now", which would make changes in destiny brought about by the application of our free-will impossible. I really cannot agree with this...
Click to expand...
Thank you for the vote of confidence. I do think (kind of) that our future incarnations are occurring simultaneously also. I have no insights into a future incarnation - unless it would be via dream states and in that case I hope that I have not "seen" the future. I am still working on understanding the future and I fear it will be too much for me to grasp.

Charles Stuart said:
As Nightrain was saying, I am quite ok to understand that 1:00 am comes before 2:00 am, and not simultaneously. Just to use another analogy, we can discover Mayan ruins of 1000 years ago, but obviously we could never find ruins of New York 1000 years ago. Although "physical time" and "spiritual time" may be different, there is nevertheless always a "linearity" to them. According to Einstein (although certainly not the same laws of physics apply in the spiritual realms), Time = Space. If there were "no time", there would also have to be "no space".
Click to expand...
I am sorry that I can't recall the man's name at this moment (he is from India, I think, and was on a Larry King show about reincarnation and quite famous) but he said that if a rock was deposited by a glacier in a field and you found that rock then the glacier didn't carry that rock to that field until you found it. Do you see where I am coming from here? The future is created in the now or perhaps the now creates the future. But I tend to think that the past and the future both are created in the now. What do you think of that? By the way, can you think of a unique term for the now?

Charles Stuart said:
I would tend to agree, but the only Original Consciousness that would be capable of doing so would be the Universal Consciousness/God...
Click to expand...
Yes, that is my meaning. Original Consciousness and God are one and the same to me.
 
sellingmysoul said:
stardis, what winds down is energy. The heat death of the universe is that state when there is no more thermodynamic free energy to sustain motion, or life. Maximum entropy has been reached. Not even black holes can escape this. The black holes will eventually dissipate, evaporate. There would be energy, but that energy would be inaccessible. The universe will be cold, dark, and basically...dead, so to speak. No eternally expanding branes, no continued life on a "higher" plane, no anything. Just a cold, dark universe forevermore.
Click to expand...
I am sure that you are correct according to what I have learned about the universe. It is a depressing thing to think about to me.


However, in my thinking this universe is just one of an infinite number of universes. I think of the scenario that you describe as an infinite number of soap bubbles (universes) and while some pop out of existence there are others popping into existence endlessly. Our incarnations endlessly being experienced elsewhere. I don't know if that is possible - it is just a thought that I entertain.
 
Hello Charles. I hope that you are safe and the rains and flooding have not caused you and your loved ones any grief or sorrow.
Click to expand...
Hi Stardis,


Yes, thank goodness, but a next-door neighbour of mine's ex-wife lost her house and seven members of her family in one of the many landslides here... :(

Interestingly, to me, is the fact that I have never felt any affection or attachment to this physical body during an OBE.
Click to expand...
Indeed why should we? It would be like feeling over-attached to any particular clothing. Our physical body is shed at the moment of the physical body's death just as we shed our clothes at the end of a day's work... :thumbsup:

I do think (kind of) that our future incarnations are occurring simultaneously also. I have no insights into a future incarnation - unless it would be via dream states and in that case I hope that I have not "seen" the future. I am still working on understanding the future and I fear it will be too much for me to grasp.
Click to expand...
Dr Brian Weiss experimented with hypnosis into "future lives", and his conclusion was that what his patients were seeing were "possible futures", which could be changed by different choices being made in the "now"...

I am sorry that I can't recall the man's name at this moment (he is from India, I think, and was on a Larry King show about reincarnation and quite famous) but he said that if a rock was deposited by a glacier in a field and you found that rock then the glacier didn't carry that rock to that field until you found it.
Click to expand...
Ah, the old question of the tree that falls in the woods... :) Here I must disagree. What this man did not take into consideration is that it is not only our own individual consciousness that "creates", but also and principally the "Greater One". :) Yes, IMO the tree does fall even when no one is looking, as is the stone taken by the glacier even if we do not see it...

The future is created in the now or perhaps the now creates the future.
Click to expand...
Here indeed we are in full agreement, my friend... :thumbsup:

But I tend to think that the past and the future both are created in the now. What do you think of that?
Click to expand...
Here we will have to "agree to disagree..." ;)

By the way, can you think of a unique term for the now?
Click to expand...
How about "The Creative Moment"??? :) :thumbsup:
 
stardis said:
I am sure that you are correct according to what I have learned about the universe. It is a depressing thing to think about to me.
However, in my thinking this universe is just one of an infinite number of universes. I think of the scenario that you describe as an infinite number of soap bubbles (universes) and while some pop out of existence there are others popping into existence endlessly. Our incarnations endlessly being experienced elsewhere. I don't know if that is possible - it is just a thought that I entertain.
Click to expand...
Yes, stardis, I should have clarified myself. When I mentioned 'branes' in my previous post, I was referring to multiple universes, and when I said 'universe' I meant reality, all universes. I apologize. I frequently forget that others can't read my mind! Yes, it is a depressing thought. But, I'd rather have truth, no matter how depressing, than a lot of supposition, with nothing to back the supposition up with. Reincarnation actually has quite a bit of science behind it, contrary to what most people think.
 
sellingmysoul said:
...I'd rather have truth, no matter how depressing, than a lot of supposition, with nothing to back the supposition up with. Reincarnation actually has quite a bit of science behind it, contrary to what most people think.
Click to expand...
I am just the opposite a lot of the time, I would rather not know the truth. When someone wants to tell me something that I may not want to hear, I will frequently cut them off in mid-sentence saying "I don't want to hear about it." I eventually hear about it anyway, though.


One of the science things that got me interested in the Creative Moment (as Charles has named it) is an article from the March 2010 Discover magazine about the past and the future collaborating to make the present. I found that very interesting and I found it interesting that the question of free will was touched upon in the article as well. I haven't been able to fit the idea of the future already being written into the idea that the universe - as we understand it - has an end to it. It really is over my head but I have a great interest in physics and geology and read everything I can about those subjects.


When Jody gave us the link about the young woman speaking a different language it set off a chain of thoughts on a subject that I have been thinking about - what is time?


If you have any ideas about science and reincarnation, please make a new thread because everyone would love to hear what you have to say about that.
 
Dr. Ian Steveson published an account of a young lady who was seriously ill and not expected to live. For a few minutes, in fact, they thought she had died, but then she recovered. The only thing is, when she recovered, she claimed to be somebody else entirely.


The detailed story that Dr. Stevenson eventually uncovered was that at the same time, at another place in the city, another young girl was dying. Her soul left her body, but she did not want to leave. She wanted to continue living, but her body was beyond repair. The first girl, whose soul had also left her body, was ready to move on. She did not want to go back into her body, even though her body was not beyond recovery.


So soul one leaves body one and goes into the light, while soul two leaves body two and moves into body one, to get a second chance at life.


Perhaps these cases are similar?
 
Hi Fiziwig,


Either that or there was a mediumnic manifestation. Do you know if the young girl survived long or passed away not long afterwards?
 
Charles Stuart said:
Hi Fiziwig,
Either that or there was a mediumnic manifestation. Do you know if the young girl survived long or passed away not long afterwards?
Click to expand...
As I recall, she lead a long and happy life in her new body, but never forgot that she had originally lived in a different body. A kind of "instant reincarnation".
 
Hi Fiziwig,


With all due respect to Dr Stevenson and to you, I believe certain testimonies must be ascertained before being taken for granted. I honestly cannot see the possibility of this just as I cannot see a story I have read here before concerning a boy who died, wandered around for a little while, and chose a phoetus body in which to reincarnate almost instantly. Even in mediumnity, one has to be constantly observant not only of the quality of the medium but also of the level of knoweldge and enlightenment of the spiritual entity that is responding.


Quite certainly the complexities of the energetic bonds that link a Soul/Spirit to its physical body cannot be substituted instantly by another. Were this so and I am quite certain that very many of the souls who discarnate would make use of this capacity to instantly return to Earth...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top