SeaAndSky
Senior Registered
Hi John,
I agree with what Eowyn has said. Her points are all good, and I think I have said many of the same things over time.
However, having said that, I am still interested in what you are bringing out. This doesn't mean that I believe that your source is accurate, trustworthy, or even "good"--there's are allegedly lots of entities, etc. out there of various types that you could be tapping into that could be feeding you information of questionable validity and/or that may not have your best interest at heart.
Still, it has been getting more interesting to me with the turn towards ancient Egypt. So, if your "source" is a bad one, at least he/she/it is feeding you something (true or not) that is more interesting than last year's sports scores. I remain curious as to where this is heading, though somewhat cautious for your welfare. The last makes me hesitant to encourage you further, but you don't seem to be any worse off so far, so . . . .
Cordially,
S&S
I agree with what Eowyn has said. Her points are all good, and I think I have said many of the same things over time.
However, having said that, I am still interested in what you are bringing out. This doesn't mean that I believe that your source is accurate, trustworthy, or even "good"--there's are allegedly lots of entities, etc. out there of various types that you could be tapping into that could be feeding you information of questionable validity and/or that may not have your best interest at heart.
Still, it has been getting more interesting to me with the turn towards ancient Egypt. So, if your "source" is a bad one, at least he/she/it is feeding you something (true or not) that is more interesting than last year's sports scores. I remain curious as to where this is heading, though somewhat cautious for your welfare. The last makes me hesitant to encourage you further, but you don't seem to be any worse off so far, so . . . .
Cordially,
S&S