• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

Ancient Egypt/The Sun... Please Help!

Science, a force dedicated to competing interpretations of presently (mis) understood data. I'm reminded of the explanation for marine fossils being found in mountainous areas when I was in high school in the 50's before the theory of tectonic plates gained favor. To me it was blatantly absurd yet it was the Science of the day - I could not explain it, but I knew the old explanation was wrong. We have gotten off topic due in large part to my earlier post and I apologize for that.

I want to thank you Ophelia for reminding me of my 20's when I was so sure of myself, I hope you handle the revelations that you will experience with grace.
 
KenJ said:
Science, a force dedicated to competing interpretations of presently (mis) understood data. I'm reminded of the explanation for marine fossils being found in mountainous areas when I was in high school in the 50's before the theory of tectonic plates gained favor. To me it was blatantly absurd yet it was the Science of the day - I could not explain it, but I knew the old explanation was wrong. We have gotten off topic due in large part to my earlier post and I apologize for that.

I want to thank you Ophelia for reminding me of my 20's when I was so sure of myself, I hope you handle the revelations that you will experience with grace.
Click to expand...


Science evolves, things are tested more intrinsically, results and findings become more accurate. We are not discussing the bible here whereas it's more readily interpretable.

With that said, granted certain aspects are more so up for interpretation, generally those things that posses little to no substantial evidence. When discussing the pyramids however, it's pretty firm evidence that indicates when they were built, why and who for. I hope that's not too self assured to say,

said with grace.
 
This is the image of the instrument..It took a little time to put the words together...as I said I needed to think about it so I could put something together that made sense ..In the end I don't think I achieved that... so make of it what you will... It would be great to see other members of the forum to talk about something different to what is already out there.. that's if you have any to talk about as I talk about on a regular basis....I have not seen anything on this forum that has not been talked about many times before in many places except for individual memories.. but the core beliefs are the same... that gives me great pause.. But here I go again talking about something that has never talked about before.. anywhere.. anyplace
I"m annoyed by that right now that no one else does this as I struggle to come to terms with what I see...Looking at this image brought back all of those bad memories of how I struggle to cope with these types of memories far away from the simple the memories of what has happened and what has been BB has done.. These types of memories for reasons I do not understand drive me nuts .. It's difficult for me to talk about something that is so complex and way beyond my capabilities of even beginning to understand the technology of what I saw.. All I can do is report what I saw in the memory... what I think about what it was and what it does may well be nothing like the reality of what it was and how it worked
To begin with I need to point out a couple of things .. Firstly I'm no artist and cannot draw things in perspective.. I'm not a technical person.. I have trouble following the most simple of instructions to achieve an outcome.. Because of my lack of artistic ability I put a circle on the paper and drew around it.. but the outer circle of the instrument was not a perfect circle
The instrument was not small around six feet long maybe even bigger it's difficult for me to remember...and was attached to four rigid poles planted firmly into the ground.. It was pointed with the top of the pyramid within the circle directly at the pyramid being built.. What I don't understand is...it was no standing upright facing the pyramid being built..it was mounted at an angle starting from the bottom of the circle and rising to the top of the circle...A person was looking through I suppose you would call it a sight at the bottom of the circle .. The V's within the pyramid and the top of the circle also had sights .. The V shapes were being moved up and down or back and forth I'm not sure which description is more accurate by a person on both side of the instrument under the instructions of the person looking through the bottom sight.. ..Later as I thought about that .. I thought that's impossible ..how could a longer V be moved to a more narrow part of the pyramid and how could a small V be moved to a larger part of the pyramid within the circle ..these are things that drive me nuts... in the memory they were easily moving them within the pyramid shape.. I cannot remember seeing any scales.. logic tells me there must have been some.. All of the sights were at different heights and the heights were adjustable.. They were adjusted under the instructions of the guy looking through the sight at the bottom of the circle
The drawing was as good as I can do from my memory of what I saw... As always happens if I saw the memory again I would know what to look for... Its not what you would call accurate but it gives a good idea of what it looked like hand how they operated it
I will now talk about some of my feelings about this memory.. often the feelings I have of a memory are relevant... they can fill in the gaps and they often have been proven to be reasonably accurate..I think these feelings are actual memories I have not seen and/or are not aware off
I feel there were more than one of these instruments being used at the same time.. making these calculations or whatever they were doing... I feel there is a strong possibility there were four being used at the one time .. one for each side of the pyramid .. It was easy for them to build an eight sided pyramid all they did was build to the middle of all of the Vs..I feel the edges of both sides of the V's of each instrument must align exactly with both the edges of the V's of the other three instruments.. so each side of the pyramid was being constructed exactly the same and aligned perfectly with each other.. I feel each V represents a stage of construction.. By moving the V's within the pyramid they could check if each stage was being constructed correctly and aligned with each other.. and also make sure they aligned with the other stages yet to be built ... I feel one of the big questions is... how long did it take to construct each stage and to complete the pyramid.. The answer to that can never be known.. because I feel.. because they had these instruments they could walked away on the completion of any of the stages and return hundreds of years later and build another stage.. In the memory there appeared to be a vast about of workers.. I could never guess how many but there were thousands of them.. as I said before there was plenty of activity inside the pyramid as well as the outside.. They must have built the inside at the same time they built the outside.. not separately... but that's a guess ..A significant feeling I have is...is about the whole project of building the pyramid is.. I feel the instruments while they were making there calculations for each stage as they were being built .. they also making calculations from the bottom of the pyramid to the top of the pyramid.. it feels to me these were separate calculations... in other words they were always constructing the pyramid to its pinnacle...the top of the pyramid.. The calculations for the top of the pyramid wereIMG_20180922_0002.jpg IMG_20180922_0002.jpg the first calculations to be made not the last ..and every calculation after that was to achieve the final calculation for the pinnacle.. Where the pinnacle finished up was the most important part of the construction.. That's all I want to share of the memory .. I have another 8 to 12 drawings of other instruments they used for various purposes
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing this John, I understand how hard it is to convey what you have experienced in an understandable way for others.
 
John Tat said:
This is the image of the instrument..It took a little time to put the words together...as I said I needed to think about it so I could put something together that made sense ..In the end I don't think I achieved that... so make of it what you will... It would be great to see other members of the forum to talk about something different to what is already out there.. that's if you have any to talk about as I talk about on a regular basis....I have not seen anything on this forum that has not been talked about many times before in many places except for individual memories.. but the core beliefs are the same... that gives me great pause.. But here I go again talking about something that has never talked about before.. anywhere.. anyplace
I"m annoyed by that right now that no one else does this as I struggle to come to terms with what I see...Looking at this image brought back all of those bad memories of how I struggle to cope with these types of memories far away from the simple the memories of what has happened and what has been BB has done.. These types of memories for reasons I do not understand drive me nuts .. It's difficult for me to talk about something that is so complex and way beyond my capabilities of even beginning to understand the technology of what I saw.. All I can do is report what I saw in the memory... what I think about what it was and what it does may well be nothing like the reality of what it was and how it worked
To begin with I need to point out a couple of things .. Firstly I'm no artist and cannot draw things in perspective.. I'm not a technical person.. I have trouble following the most simple of instructions to achieve an outcome.. Because of my lack of artistic ability I put a circle on the paper and drew around it.. but the outer circle of the instrument was not a perfect circle
The instrument was not small around six feet long maybe even bigger it's difficult for me to remember...and was attached to four rigid poles planted firmly into the ground.. It was pointed with the top of the pyramid within the circle directly at the pyramid being built.. What I don't understand is...it was no standing upright facing the pyramid being built..it was mounted at an angle starting from the bottom of the circle and rising to the top of the circle...A person was looking through I suppose you would call it a sight at the bottom of the circle .. The V's within the pyramid and the top of the circle also had sights .. The V shapes were being moved up and down or back and forth I'm not sure which description is more accurate by a person on both side of the instrument under the instructions of the person looking through the bottom sight.. ..Later as I thought about that .. I thought that's impossible ..how could a longer V be moved to a more narrow part of the pyramid and how could a small V be moved to a larger part of the pyramid within the circle ..these are things that drive me nuts... in the memory they were easily moving them within the pyramid shape.. I cannot remember seeing any scales.. logic tells me there must have been some.. All of the sights were at different heights and the heights were adjustable.. They were adjusted under the instructions of the guy looking through the sight at the bottom of the circle
The drawing was as good as I can do from my memory of what I saw... As always happens if I saw the memory again I would know what to look for... Its not what you would call accurate but it gives a good idea of what it looked like hand how they operated it
I will now talk about some of my feelings about this memory.. often the feelings I have of a memory are relevant... they can fill in the gaps and they often have been proven to be reasonably accurate..I think these feelings are actual memories I have not seen and/or are not aware off
I feel there were more than one of these instruments being used at the same time.. making these calculations or whatever they were doing... I feel there is a strong possibility there were four being used at the one time .. one for each side of the pyramid .. It was easy for them to build an eight sided pyramid all they did was build to the middle of all of the Vs..I feel the edges of both sides of the V's of each instrument must align exactly with both the edges of the V's of the other three instruments.. so each side of the pyramid was being constructed exactly the same and aligned perfectly with each other.. I feel each V represents a stage of construction.. By moving the V's within the pyramid they could check if each stage was being constructed correctly and aligned with each other.. and also make sure they aligned with the other stages yet to be built ... I feel one of the big questions is... how long did it take to construct each stage and to complete the pyramid.. The answer to that can never be known.. because I feel.. because they had these instruments they could walked away on the completion of any of the stages and return hundreds of years later and build another stage.. In the memory there appeared to be a vast about of workers.. I could never guess how many but there were thousands of them.. as I said before there was plenty of activity inside the pyramid as well as the outside.. They must have built the inside at the same time they built the outside.. not separately... but that's a guess ..A significant feeling I have is...is about the whole project of building the pyramid is.. I feel the instruments while they were making there calculations for each stage as they were being built .. they also making calculations from the bottom of the pyramid to the top of the pyramid.. it feels to me these were separate calculations... in other words they were always constructing the pyramid to its pinnacle...the top of the pyramid.. The calculations for the top of the pyramid wereView attachment 683 View attachment 683 the first calculations to be made not the last ..and every calculation after that was to achieve the final calculation for the pinnacle.. Where the pinnacle finished up was the most important part of the construction.. That's all I want to share of the memory .. I have another 8 to 12 drawings of other instruments they used for various purposes
Click to expand...

It's very interesting and quite plausible that they used instruments like this for the accuracy of the pyramids that are now lost to us today... what was the instrument made out of?
 
Hi Opelia 3 That' a very good question I did not mention that because I did not want to come across as whacko on such a serious subject to me They were made from a material a gift from the gods that fell from the sky..sounds whacko I know but that's what BB told me
 
Hi Speedwell... thanks for that...that is very likely and makes a lot of sense.. How did you know about such an obscure thing? that interests me.. I will do some research on it and see when that all began for Ancient Egyptians... thanks
 
John Tat said:
Hi Speedwell... thanks for that...that is very likely and makes a lot of sense.. How did you know about such an obscure thing? that interests me.. I will do some research on it and see when that all began for Ancient Egyptians... thanks
Click to expand...
Glad it was of some use John. How did I know such an obscure thing? Well, as a child I was interested in all sorts of things, dinosaurs, fossils, meteorites ... It's not a main interest, but things which fall from the skies can certainly be interesting, whether it's frogs and fish from a sea or lake, or lumps of rock and iron from space. It has even been suggested that some chemical components of life itself originated beyond Earth, though it seems very difficult to establish with any certainty one way or the other.
 
Hi Speedwell,

Interesting link--with a quite understandable emphasis on meteoric iron used for weaponry. I became interested in the subject of meteoric iron many years ago while I was looking into the "spear of destiny" and its supposed companion weapon, a sword with similar powers but not such a lofty back-story (though many would consider its supposed role as Excalibur to be fame enough). Anyhow, whether rightly or wrongly these weapons were allegedly forged together from meteoric iron at a very early date. According to some sources, before the flood. It was interesting reading, and though I still find the subject intriguing the main thing I brought out of it was the information that in earlier eras (including the bronze age) iron in a workable form was very rare and its only known source was from certain meteorites. In turn, an iron sword (with or without magic) was an extremely formidable weapon when everyone else was wielding bronze (a comparably softer metal). I can see how a lot of legends would attach to such weapons.

Cordially,
S&S

PS--The "Holy Lance" currently on display is allegedly a very good replica, with the real item once again lost or secreted--ready once more to be found/seized by the "right" person and set the world on its ear. The legends gathered around this weapon remind one of Tolkien's ring, which seems to have been inspired by some mix of Solomon's Ring, the Ring of the Nibelungs, and the Holy Lance (with a lot of Tolkien's own originality thrown in).
 
A link was sent to me in a private conversation that gives a better insight into this subject.. with the Ancient Egyptians..The link worked on the message but I cannot get it to work when I duplicate it that happens all the time to me... maybe someone can gives me some tips on how to it it properly.. anyway I get to the right web page by googling Iron From The Sky an AHRC funded research project
This is all fascinating to me ... As has happened many times on the forum things that have been passed onto me have are proven to be accurate ... now I'm saying to myself this instrument is real the two go together ... its interesting how your imagination can take over when you are searching for answers..the only answer I could imagine was it was space junk that fell from the sky... that was really whacko
 
SeaAndSky said:
Hi Speedwell,

Interesting link--with a quite understandable emphasis on meteoric iron used for weaponry. I became interested in the subject of meteoric iron many years ago while I was looking into the "spear of destiny" and its supposed companion weapon, a sword with similar powers but not such a lofty back-story (though many would consider its supposed role as Excalibur to be fame enough). Anyhow, whether rightly or wrongly these weapons were allegedly forged together from meteoric iron at a very early date. According to some sources, before the flood. It was interesting reading, and though I still find the subject intriguing the main thing I brought out of it was the information that in earlier eras (including the bronze age) iron in a workable form was very rare and its only known source was from certain meteorites. In turn, an iron sword (with or without magic) was an extremely formidable weapon when everyone else was wielding bronze (a comparably softer metal). I can see how a lot of legends would attach to such weapons.

Cordially,
S&S

PS--The "Holy Lance" currently on display is allegedly a very good replica, with the real item once again lost or secreted--ready once more to be found/seized by the "right" person and set the world on its ear. The legends gathered around this weapon remind one of Tolkien's ring, which seems to have been inspired by some mix of Solomon's Ring, the Ring of the Nibelungs, and the Holy Lance (with a lot of Tolkien's own originality thrown in).
Click to expand...

Ah the infamous spear of destiny that Jesus was stabbed with on the cross allegedly. Anyone that has that has ultimate power. Supposedly Hitler had it also, although it was taken off him, By UN forces ( i think). Soon as he lost that he lodt his power. As far as im aware its vanished again. Theres a lot more to the spears story as well. Quite interesting.
 
The discussion about who built the pyramids and when is proof to me that there has been plenty of talk about when the pyramids were built and who built them.. mostly all science fiction and fantasy... but when the opportunity presents itself to bring meaningful discussions about the subject there is an eerie silence.... all of a sudden these members of the forum and a moderator who make these bold science fiction statements about when the the pyramids were built and who built them stay well away from saying anything of substance when the opportunity presents itself... most likely because they have nothing to contribute..only fantasy...give me a break
 
Last edited:
John Tat said:
The discussion about who built the pyramids and when is proof to me that there has been plenty of talk about when the pyramids were built and who built them.. mostly all science fiction and fantasy... but when the opportunity presents itself to bring meaningful discussions about the subject there is an eerie silence.... all of a sudden these members of the forum and a moderator who make these bold science fiction statements about when the the pyramids were built and who built them stay well away from saying anything of substance when the opportunity presents itself... most likely because they have nothing to contribute..only fantasy...give me a break
Click to expand...

:) You seem a little upset / frustrated ... I guess, there's another reason than the lack of forumites willing to argue with you, and you just vented here ...

Okay, I'll help: I believe that the pyramids were built by "people" more advanced than the ancient Egyptians described by the historians' consensus. I also doubt those historians' estimates for the age of the pyramids and the Sphinx.

Proof? Same as yours: direct knowledge acquired in altered state of consciousness. :)
 
baro-san said:
:) You seem a little upset / frustrated ... I guess, there's another reason than the lack of forumites willing to argue with you, and you just vented here ...

Okay, I'll help: I believe that the pyramids were built by "people" more advanced than the ancient Egyptians described by the historians' consensus. I also doubt those historians' estimates for the age of the pyramids and the Sphinx.

Proof? Same as yours: direct knowledge acquired in altered state of consciousness. :)
Click to expand...

So you're going to dismiss scientific evidence (remember all the fields, anthropological, archaeological, geological, Egyptological and etc) because of regressive memories which could've been interrupted/influenced or misinterpreted?

Interesting.
 
baro-san I'm neither looking for an argument or venting.. As I talked about at the beginning of the post on the instrument ...I have a frustration why others do not stand up as I do and talk about things that have not been heard about or known about before.. Your last post is a good example....You offered two statements.. First you said you do not agree with the historic evidence of when the pyramids and the sphinx were built that they were built by "people" more advanced than the Ancient Egyptians...but you offered nothing to backup that statement
Your second statement... Proof? Same as yours direct knowledge in an altered state of consciousness...again you offered nothing to backup that statement
Both of us know ..when we see things /memories and/or are given access to memories and knowledge they are in great detail.. even if they only last for a short time... great detail to the point where we really need to experience them again because we missed so much the first time
I offered a reasonably detailed account of what I saw.. even though it is a very short version of what I saw
You offered nothing of what you saw and/or the knowledge you were given access to ... that would backup your beliefs/statements
I hope you post a detailed post just as I did about what you saw during your altered state of consciousness..that makes you so sure you are right.. As I said I'm neither venting or arguing.. just asking for details about beliefs..what is said and claimed.. which goes back to my initial frustrations
 
Last edited:
@John Tat:

I understand your point. I'm just not interested in sharing with others what I experienced on this subject, especially because I was kind of surprised myself. The Pyramids of Egypt aren't a subject of much interest to me, so I preferred not to start a contradictory discussion on it, because it would lead nowhere for me, and won't help anybody else either.

I just replied because you invited replies. The fact that some of my information is similar to others' hypotheses, and / or their altered states experiences, isn't really a solid proof in my view. There were additional details I haven't heard from others.

I'm reasonably confident that my experiences yield generally accurate information, more than I trust others' opinions (including "scientists"). When I find out that my position on any subject needs to be amended, I amend it.

I'm not interested in convincing others about anything, and I prefer to avoid being subjected to impolite / rude comments, that easily happen on the anonymous internet.

I hope this satisfies you.
 
In regards to someone mentioning above that they feel as if they don't belong to modern times I can totally relate. I've always felt detached from the present moment and throughout my life people have mentioned that I always a) am in my own world and b) always never want to be where I am. I can't relate to modern society, particularly western society. When I've visited places that are more in tune to their traditional ancient history for example Greece, Turkey and etc I feel more at ease and more comfortable, closer to home. I'm always yearning to go back in time, particularly to the real ancient times.

So I guess my question in regards to this feeling of displacement is, assuming we all have multiple past lives, in this present life could we be more connected to a specific past life and not necessarily the one just prior to this life? And do all people have multiple past lives?

Thanks.
 
Hi Ophelia3.. IMO its important to understand Opelia3 has never had a past life... There is no such thing as physical reincarnation... Ophelia3 the same as all of the physical entities your spiritual self has occupied will die and will never return...your spiritual self never dies.. she goes on and on incarnation after incarnation... IMO its important to understand that distinction and where your feelings may be coming from... that its your spiritual self feeling those connections not the physical Ophelia3
 
Hi Ophelia,

I have increasingly felt this way as the years have gone by. In my youth I dreamed of the stars, of space travel and wonders of science. I don't think I ever anticipated what was being lost in the process on the one hand and the fact that change is never restricted to just one area. The marvels that have come scientifically have been wonders in some respects and terrors in others. However, I don't think I truly understood the fact back then that change would also be revolutionary in political, social, religious and cultural areas. These have also been wonders in some respects and just the opposite in others. However, I hope I will not be banned for saying that many of the changes I have seen have been for the worst. It is difficult to pick and choose, and the best of some things--like the internet--also bring with them the worst.

But what concerns me most about all of the changes I like the least is that there seems to be a growing quality of frenzy and madness about them and those who promote them. I had hoped and thought that "The West" as a whole was headed in the opposite direction and leading the rest of the world in that direction. However, that seems as well to have been a part of my youthful naivete. You will know this "spirit" when you see it. There is always a frenzied and maddened quality about it, a tremendous hostility to history and traditional and a willingness and desire to destroy all that stands in the way, quash all opposing freedom of thought and dissent, and to impose complete conformity to their "ideal". I.e., it is always ultimately totalitarian in the realm of culture, religion and politics and seeks to overturn and crush all traditional mores and beliefs in favor of what its adherents consider to be more "enlightened" values. From this standpoint, no one in history is "pure" enough. All are irrevocably tainted except a few they consider to have been early proto-advocates. The remainder must be defaced and their memory erased if not useful to the cause. Ultimately, they leave only themselves and their cohorts as the source of values and wisdom. It is easy enough to see it and its ugly out-working in the French Revolution and the Communist Revolution and the reigns of terror and bloodshed that followed their successes. However, it is difficult and painful to see this tendency cropping up more and more in your own culture.

Cordially,
S&S

PS--Lest it be said that I am throwing out the baby with the bathwater, I need to add that not all social/religious/cultural changes are bad. Quite the opposite. Many have been great and long overdue. However, my complaint is lodged against those who take the opposite approach and treat all established social/religious/cultural ways as bad, especially the more fanatical advocates of this approach.

PPS--I think this way of looking at things is almost inevitable with the type of historically broadened perspective that PLs facilitate. You can't help but see what was lost from the past as well as what may have been gained.
 
Last edited:
SeaAndSky said:
...
Click to expand...

Reading your post, my first thought was that George Orwell's "1984", and "Animal Farm" should be mandatory in school.

My second thought is that, unfortunately, every reader of those books will make of them whatever confirms their already formed beliefs. In school, the teachers' personal beliefs would overtake the feeble minds of their pupils.

The beauty of life is that it doesn't matter what we, individually, believe, feel, think, and do. Life goes on following immutable laws, some we know of, some we don't. Ultimately all this will feel like dream.
 
baro-san said:
Reading your post, my first thought was that George Orwell's "1984", and "Animal Farm" should be mandatory in school.

My second thought is that, unfortunately, every reader of those books will make of them whatever confirms their already formed beliefs. In school, the teachers' personal beliefs would overtake the feeble minds of their pupils.

The beauty of life is that it doesn't matter what we, individually, believe, feel, think, and do. Life goes on following immutable laws, some we know of, some we don't. Ultimately all this will feel like dream.
Click to expand...
Animal Farm was at my school as well as Charlotte's web
 
Hi Baro-san,

I read the usual trio for that period of time in my youth: 1984, Animal Farm, and Brave New World. This was not, however, typical of all high school students in the 1960s. Unfortunately, those who can see through what is happening are not those who are pushing through a twisted agenda. One of the things that characterizes the latter group is a general inability to see themselves in the descriptions I have given. If they do, you will generally find a second characteristic (or rationalization): the ends justify the means. I.e., me and mine are aiming for something --insert some suitably cosmic language here-- and the price to be paid (generally by others) is worth it. Besides they are --insert some suitably insulting/derogatory language here-- and do not deserve to be taken into consideration.

Cordially,
S&S
 
Animal Farm was also taught at my school and I'm from a much later generation. I also watched the cartoon when I was like 8 and it scarred me for life. With that said, English was a very heavily PC subject, so I can relate to what you say about the political and religious changes, but again some of them are positive.

I think for me it's a loss of rawness and being in tune with nature we experience through modern society. Loss of connection with nature particularly after the rise of Christianity. Pagan Gods/Goddesses were very intune with nature. I love raw beauty, in this society everything is so focused on fabricated beauty, photoshop, contouring and etc.

John Tat, I know that we reincarnate spiritually, my question was do we tend to be impacted more by certain PL's and not necessarily our most recent PL's? Also it's often discussed that we can share certain physical traits with our PL's appearance?
 
SeaAndSky said:
Hi Baro-san,

I read the usual trio for that period of time in my youth: 1984, Animal Farm, and Brave New World. This was not, however, typical of all high school students in the 1960s. Unfortunately, those who can see through what is happening are not those who are pushing through a twisted agenda. One of the things that characterizes the latter group is a general inability to see themselves in the descriptions I have given. If they do, you will generally find a second characteristic (or rationalization): the ends justify the means. I.e., me and mine are aiming for something --insert some suitably cosmic language here-- and the price to be paid (generally by others) is worth it. Besides they are --insert some suitably insulting/derogatory language here-- and do not deserve to be taken into consideration.

Cordially,
S&S
Click to expand...
From spiritual advancement point of view, overcoming our fears is probably the most important. Without that we can't "survive" in the afterlife because our fears will degenerate into nightmares, immediately. We reincarnate because we can't "live" in the non-physical (not to move ahead humanity). While here, in the physical, we take short trips into non-physical when dreaming, and quickly wake up (come back) when needed.

So, those who promise a better world instilling fear in us (like news media, politicians, activists, religions) do us a much bigger damage than destroying our peace of mind: they stagnate our souls' evolution. The solution: a diet! Reduce / eliminate them from your daily intake! If we, humans, won't do that, another regulating higher power will do it in one way or another, as it likely did it with other self entitled "advanced civilizations".

When we're very young we are controlled by our instincts, as we age we are controlled by our emotions, then we reach the age of intellect, aging into an age of intuition, hopefully. Surely, there is a lot of variability from one human to another. From soul evolvement point of view, humans are in soul's youth (under 20 maybe? ... :))
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top